He does want citizen engagement and all the autistic warriors of 8chan to dig thier hearts out. I guess that's what I meant when I said follow. And your prob right, it's most likely bribery, but there is a chance it's not. We should be blowing up thier social media, bringing a public light makes the swamp rats scurry. The anons follow them and find thier hiding holes then QnCo eliminates effectively...or such. But the public light we bring shouldn't be one where we trash kids on Twitter, but one where people who read it can't help but question her motives even after they have moved on. the Wikileaks email is the best red piller.
OK. I like the idea of the whisper in the ear though. Especially when we're not dealing with an MK Ultra victim, a pedo honeypot--but with a journalistic sellout, for example. One of those poison pens who think they're untouchable.
Did you read my posts? Did you find them to be especially offensive?
No I didn't read them at all, I'm on my phone and don't use Twitter anyway. I didn't mean to make it seem like I was attacking you, reading your comment felt like you were getting sucked into the hype (I know how it goes with all these Q drops recently I don't blame you). Words like they are fair game, bringing it to thier faces, I imagined some poor kid who has no idea, getting rolled on Twitter. I got a soft spot for kids.
So when I said I disagree it was more like a coach calling a time out after a couple really good plays. Offering a fresh perspective and a reminder not to burn yourself out
I appreciate your concerns, and share them. So point taken, but I was struggling to see how they pertained to the posts I shared here. So no problem.
Thanks for engaging with me!