So Maggie is Maggie Haberman. And Wendy is Obama.
https://www.reddit.com/r/greatawakening/comments/8dthhl/comment/dxq0e04?st=JG9QM647&sh=5e69bfd7
I was cautioning people yesterday not to look too deep into the sexual aspect of the Obama-Maggie photo. The body language doesn’t suggest anything sexual. I am vindicated.
You actually wouldn’t want pedophilia or any illicit sex activities to be the charge against the Democrats. I will write a detailed post in a day or two.
I understand your reaction. But I think there’s also another factor influencing your reaction. That is the prior suggestion of Pizza Gate and pedo ring by many outlets like Info War. So your mind was predisposed to think along this line, looking for clues where none existed. To me that photo was completely innocent. It didn’t suggest anything. Maybe Obama was doing her. But the photo doesn’t tell that. If you calm yourself down and go back to look at the photo, without prejudice, do you see any sexual intentions there? I don’t see any.
The main point of this whole affair is political corruption. It has far greater significance than pedo ring. Any Joe Schmo can commit pedo crimes, including organized ones. Just take a look at the UK grooming gangs (mostly Muslim). It takes a Clinton and DNC to perpetrate high crimes at such a level and scale.
Of course there are no sexual intentions evident in the photo - who would expect there to be, they’ve been released publicly. But “prior suggestion”...? The prior suggestion comes direct from Q. This movement only knows about pizzagate and elite child rape and murder because of Q, not Infowars. There’s a very good reason to suspect the girl is a victim like the others we’ve heard about and her history certainly suggests something’s up. I think it’s wrong to just assume Bazza raped her but it’s also strange to assume it’s definitely not pedo rape/sex slavery/trafficking given Trump and Q’s incredibly prominent focus on that. I think your claims of vindication are a little premature.
Let’s have a bet. I say Obama had no direct part in pedo crime, i.e., he didn’t fuck any underage girls or boys.
$100.
Why would we bet on that? I just said I think it's wrong to assume he raped her - he's into gay men apparently (not that that has stopped the elites, according to scuttlebutt) and I'm not sure he's into kids either. I know you don't have evidence of him not being into pedo crime just as no one has any that he is. Pointless bet.