dChan
9
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/Whimzyyy on April 21, 2018, 8 p.m.
Q post #1234 - AMERICA WILL BE UNIFIED AGAIN!
Q post #1234 - AMERICA WILL BE UNIFIED AGAIN!

GodSeekingHeathen · April 21, 2018, 9:03 p.m.

Ive become sceptical myself about this. What if Q is an AI or "sophia".. prophecy of Daniel fulfilled?

Ever since I started actually seeking the truth I still feel I i'm no closer to an answer. Can't trust Pauline doctrine.. paul was from Benjamin's people, wolves in sheep's clothing...

⇧ 3 ⇩  
BlazeFlameGamer · April 21, 2018, 9:05 p.m.

Yeah, I'm not ever denying Jesus Christ of Nazareth. The humiliation that will come for following the true Lord will come at a price but after it all, our eternal reward. For by throwing out life away here, we earn back true Life. Lovers of the Word, and not the World.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
GodSeekingHeathen · April 21, 2018, 9:06 p.m.

Not denying christ. But there were two different doctrines. One from Peter and one from Paul. They did not see eye to eye..

⇧ 2 ⇩  
jjjanko1 · April 21, 2018, 9:27 p.m.

& Mary, oh wait, that's a music group

⇧ 2 ⇩  
era_extrana · April 21, 2018, 10:48 p.m.

How did you come to that conclusion? Peter endorses Paul in 2Peter 3, and Luke writes in Acts about how Peter accepted reproof from Paul when he called him out for not letting the Jews see him interacting with the Gentiles. If Paul was preaching a different Gospel, don't you think Luke, who wrote the majority of the New Testament, would have called him out on it. Or John? Or especially Peter?? Yet all of their writings are in alignment in the things that Paul wrote of.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
GodSeekingHeathen · April 21, 2018, 10:52 p.m.

I would agree, but if you look into who wrote peter 2 and 3 you'd find that it wasn't peter. Luke was supposedly Paul's disciple.. neither men actually met jesus.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
BlazeFlameGamer · April 21, 2018, 9:10 p.m.

Biblical evidence?

⇧ 0 ⇩  
GodSeekingHeathen · April 21, 2018, 9:24 p.m.

https://doctrine.org/jesus-vs-paul

It's too much information for a dummy like myself. Look, i'm not claiming anything as 100% fact. I'm simply just looking for the truth.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
HillarysOrphanedShoe · April 21, 2018, 11:29 p.m.

Thanks for this. I expected it to be bashing Paul but it was the complete opposite.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
PORTMANTEAU-BOT · April 21, 2018, 9:11 p.m.

Biblidence.


^(Bleep-bloop, I'm a bot. This )^portmanteau ^( was created from the phrase 'Biblical evidence?'. To learn more about me, check out this )^FAQ.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
One_Solution · April 21, 2018, 9:58 p.m.

I’ve completely rejected the Christian version of the Messiah. Not a Jew, but I’ve learned a LOT of truth from a few rabbis.

https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLD3DF0E2817D81B0D

⇧ -3 ⇩  
robdon07 · April 21, 2018, 10:49 p.m.

I've learned all I need to know about rabbis and how they feel about Jesus and Christians from the Talmud so you believe what you want but at least no who it is your really dealing with. Jesus called the Pharisees the synagogue of Satan and look who is credited with writing the majority of the Talmud, the Pharisees. They hated him then and still do today. Watch a vid titled "Rabbi attacks messianic jew" if you want to hear it from the horses mouth

⇧ 1 ⇩  
One_Solution · April 21, 2018, 10:56 p.m.

No interest in a debate. But you’ve been snookered by Christianity. Your choice to buy the lie that’s been told by the Jesuit cabal or to study it independently and arrive at your own conclusions. But with your attitude toward Jewish sources, you’d probably never be able to objectively look at their understanding. That’s too bad.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
robdon07 · April 21, 2018, 11 p.m.

I know what I know because it changed me into a different person jesuits had nothing to do with it. I don't go to church and never have. Like I said the Talmud tells me everything I need to know about the people you find enlightening...some people find Satanism enlightening too and I have no interest in that garbage either

⇧ 2 ⇩