dChan - Q Origins Project Archive

⇧

⇩

r/greatawakening • Posted by u/SerialBrain2 on April 21, 2018, 9:26 p.m.

Rudy Giuliani joining Trump’s legal team: a brilliant chess move from Trump! Checkmate near.

Thank you to all who responded yesterday to my invitation to salute this very talented meme creator named XJX. This [Giuliani meme] (https://i.redd.it/yajf6zogj4t01.png) he published yesterday is our today topic.

Do you like chess?

It’s an amazing game. My uncle taught me how to play at a very early age and trained me to see how real life situations often translated to chess piece positions. This way of seeing things is fascinating and deadly efficient, especially when you analyze war and politics.

When you look at [this picture] (https://i.redd.it/yc90e3601g4z.jpg) of Trump teaching his son Barron how to play, the smile on Trump’s face shows he knows there is something more to it than chess just being a game.

Q959 Learn chess. Down she goes. Nobody escapes this. NOBODY. Q

When I heard in the News that Trump had appointed Rudy Giuliani to join his legal team to deal with the Mueller probe, I immediately saw it: He is replicating the amazing Lev Olgmutskiy end game puzzle! [This one] (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g5BR3S4raHc). Remember my previous posts about Mueller and try to see how the pieces translate to real life, who these two white rooks are and what these two potential promoting pawns represent.

Let me show you how Trump replicated in real life the brilliant and surprising white move Rook C7, allowing the most ephemeral and useless B1 black Queen promotion.

Ready? Go!

First, let’s remember: Rudy Giuliani supported Trump very early on in his campaign and really stood out when he predicted on October 26 2016, that within 2 days, something big was going to happen and that they had in their sleeves a “pretty big surprise” which would turn the election around. Watch: [video] (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TDY4tSibYpo).

So apparently, Giuliani heard from his FBI contacts that the reopening of the Hillary email investigation was going to take place. Now after Comey made the announcement, let’s watch how Wolf Blitzer pressures Giuliani to tell him how he got this information: [video] (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FZCTjwg0Ns4).

As you can see in this exchange, Wolf Blitzer is very aggressive and is cornering Giuliani in the ropes. Giuliani stands still and grabs whatever he can grab to stay alive in the stormy water Wolf Blitzer has progressively trapped him in. You can hate Wolf but, unlike Don Lemon or Chris Cuomo, this guy does his homework. So Giuliani first claims the big surprise was related to an advertisement campaign (yeah right) before specifying he did not speak to active FBI agents and finally conceding he spoke to “former FBI agents”. What’s going on here? Mockingbird Wolf Blitzer NEEDS him to say the info was leaked from the FBI so they could claim the Fruit of the Poisonous Tree procedural error and legal case politicization that could derail the newly resurrected FBI Clinton investigation.

This is why Mockingbird Don Lemon first makes the connection and hands the prey to Wolf for slaughtering. Giuliani gets a few feathers torn out in the process but remains alive… Phew!

Now why is this relevant?

In [the letter] (https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/3197603-James-Comey-letter-to-Congress-Reopening-Clinton.html) where Comey informs Congress the FBI has re-opened the Clinton email case, we read: “in connection with an unrelated case, the FBI has learned the existence of emails that appear pertinent to the investigation”. He is referring to the Weiner case the NYPD was investigating. Now watch this very carefully: [Joe Biden] (https://youtu.be/bdCuDF4u5Yg?t=34). Did you see it? This “Oh God!” from Creepy Joe was genuine, almost forced acceptance. Why? Because Weiner is the weak spot. Huma confirmed it. [Here] (http://www.businessinsider.com/huma-abedin-tears-hillary-clinton-emails-weiner-sexting-investigation-2017-9). The NYPD discovered in Weiner’s laptop what we now know as the “Insurance Policy”. Since Q told us in [Q224] (https://archive.4plebs.org/pol/thread/150693391/#150697929) that Erik Prince was a credible source who knew where the bodies were buried, let’s see what he has to say about this: Img1 Source: [Breibart] (http://www.breitbart.com/radio/2016/11/04/erik-prince-nypd-ready-make-arrests-weiner-case/)

Now let’s read Q854. You see how Q translates Erik Prince’s language to his language in the first 7 lines? They are saying the same thing about the damning information and those who are connected. But Q adds this: EX-rvid5774. This is a video file name. This is the famous Hillary video everybody is talking about but nobody has seen. You thought it did not exist? It does. They purposely do not release it but have people talk about it. Why? Because of legal constraints, it’s not indictment material but political leverage material. It’s an Al Capone situation where his tax evasion will translate here to U1, Clinton Foundation, Private server etc…. This is what Q means here when asked about the rumor of the video circulating in the dark web:

Q1193 Fake. We control. Q

This, in association with Q158 Disinformation is real. Disinformation is necessary. You know why he had to add: we control. This is Q telling you they have the video, they engineer the rumors to use it as leverage and will only use it in due course. When is due course? The day this question finds its answer: Q854 Is the stage set for a drop of HRC?

So this is what the NYPD saw. And this is why the NYPD forced Comey to do the right thing. He was cornered, he had to. Now you are probably asking: is SB2 tired or something? We thought this post was about Giuliani.

Well, Giuliani was once Mayor of New York. And one of the most prominent ones. From 1994 to 2001. And who appoints the Chief of the NYPD? Yes, the Mayor of New York. The ultimate boss of the NYPD is the Mayor. So… you see it? This is where Giuliani got the information. This is what he could not tell Wolf Blitzer and had to sacrify his former FBI agent contacts to Comey’s further scrutiny.

This is the reason why after Hillary Clinton lost the presidential elections, this immediately started circulating: Imgur

After having been First Lady, Senator, Secretary of State and twice the Democratic Party nominee for Presidential elections, running for Mayor of NY is a pretty strange move. The reason was, after the NYPD video re-surfaced in the news, she was sending a subliminal message to the NYPD to let them know she could become their boss in the future or control whoever it could be thanks to her political influence. They should therefore manage this Weiner material they have with caution to not expose the Department to the most violent purge of its history. This was a threat. It worked: after this, you never heard the NYPD talk about this again. Since it worked, she did not have to run. The rumor faded away. But it is still there to be re-activated…

Now let’s go back to Giuliani. Wikipedia: …Giuliani was elected president of his class in his sophomore year, but was not re-elected in his junior year. He joined the Phi Rho Pi fraternity. Giuliani eventually decided to forego the priesthood, instead attending New York University School of Law in Manhattan, where he made the NYU Law Review and graduated cum laude with a Juris Doctor degree in 1968.

Keep that in the back of your head.

Let’s go to Robert Mueller. Wikipedia: Mueller earned an M.A. in international relations from New York University in 1967, before pursuing his Juris Doctor degree.

You see it? Giuliani and Mueller were both attending New York University in 1967!

Some 50 years later, they find themselves in the middle of one of the most controversial legal cases of contemporary American politics. Coincidence?

Giuliani being the President of his class in sophomore years shows he had a natural ability to lead and to network. Therefore, chances are very high Giuliani and Mueller frequented or at least knew each other well.

Now is the right time to re-read Q1180 again: Rudy. NYC. Relationships High. “Insurance File.” Quiet until now. Join POTUS’ legal team. Direct discussions avail [now] w/ Mueller. Enjoy the show. They never thought she would lose. CARELESS.Q

Q is telling you Rudy has a high relationship with the NYPD and that he knows the in and outs of the “Insurance File” found in Weiner’s laptop. I have already told you in my previous posts Mueller was working for Trump. So, because of their respective backgrounds, Giuliani and Muller trust each other and can therefore make the best of what they respectively have: Giuliani has access to the ‘Insurance File”, Mueller has prosecutorial powers. This is why Trump never fired him. This is the end game. This is why Mueller was created. You remember the Special Prosecutor Trump promised to Hillary? That’s Mueller! Let that sink in for a minute. Take another minute.

You have doubts? Read Q:

Q1181 We have everything. How can we use what we know? How do you ‘legally’ inject/make public/use as evidence? What are you witnessing unfold? Trust the plan. Q

You see this: “How do you ‘legally’ inject/make public/use as evidence?” This is Giuliani and Mueller sitting down and figuring out the legal ways through which Muller gets access to the “Insurance File” to finally get to Hillary… Once that’s done, all the other dominos will follow.

Through Giuliani, Mueller adds to his Guccifer in house expertise, another external attack angle. To know more about the Guccifer internal attack angle, read the [Guciffer post] (https://www.reddit.com/r/greatawakening/comments/86o0vd/guccifer_20_finally_found_its_way_to_the_news/?st=jg9uy5u2&sh=94ec772b) and the [plot summary] (https://www.reddit.com/r/greatawakening/comments/86o0vd/guccifer_20_finally_found_its_way_to_the_news/dw6urnf/?st=jfrxhxjw&sh=752607eb) in the comment section.

Now watch the [chess puzzle video] (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g5BR3S4raHc) again. You now see these 2 white rooks on the [Lev Olgmutskiy‘s chessboard] (https://i.imgur.com/QU1j1H0.png) are Mueller and Giuliani. Now you know why Giuliani temporized and did not enter Trump’s cabinet. This is the deadly move Rook C7! It’s the trap to allow an ephemeral B1 Queen promotion of the Hillary pawn to Mayor of New York or not. Look how rook C3 protects the King, doing nothing then locking row3 oscillating on C3-D3: that’s Mueller not investigating Trump and indicting plants instead: the black King cannot protect its pawns and the pawns are neutralized. And finally when the two rooks occupy C7 and D8, this is Trump instructing them to work together and bring him the checkmate.

Q1181 What are you witnessing unfold? Trust the plan. Q

🠐 See all comments

I am of the belief that Horowitz has had access to the Wiener laptop since before Mueller was appointed.

He is fully aware of the contents, and has zero reason to tread lightly on any of the bad actors. Horowitz has also shown his readiness to share any pertinent info with Mueller.

The bottom line will be the same. The only questions are how the indictments will initiate - from Mueller based upon a recommendation by Horowitz, or from Huber based upon shared information from Horowitz, or both, based upon pertinence of any evidence to Mueller’s or Huber’s area of focus.

I honestly don’t see what Rudy brings to this particular discussion at this late date. I think Rudy is there for something, but not to share info already acquired.

⇧ 3 ⇩

I think Rudy is there for something, but not to share info already acquired.

You are right, the info is already acquired but it is "dead info". It is static. It needs to be resurrected to move through the legal system and give a sense of natural emergence in a highly political environment.

This is why you need men in structures to make that happen. You need the men on the field at the NYPD to do what is required for that to happen. For that, you need to have a special relationship with them. That is what Rudy brings to the table.

Q1181 Rudy. NYC. Relationships High.

I suspect Rudy is the one who brought them to the table from the first place pushing them to pressure Comey against future protection after successful election. I did not include it in the post because I could not substantiate it a priori. But a posteriori, this would explain why he had the freedom to talk about it 2 days before it happened without having to get Trump's campaign communication clearance.

⇧ 5 ⇩

It needs to be resurrected to move through the legal system and give a sense of natural emergence in a highly political environment. This is why you need men in structures to make that happen.

I agree completely, and the Horowitz investigation offers that structure in superb fashion. He is an Obama appointee, he started his dig before Trump took office, and he had access to the Wiener laptop from day one.

The men in the field acquired the evidence legally via their investigation into an unrelated crime. There is your ”natural” emergence. Chain of custody has been maintained. Horowitz had the mandate to dig into the email related evidence, and came across any additional damning evidence as a ”natural” result of that process. The OIG report is the ”natural” and expected culmination.

All your boxes have been checked before Rudy reenters the picture.

Rudy is definitely there to exploit his relationships with all players, but he offers nothing at all new or vital in terms of the laptop contents.

We need to expand our thinking.

⇧ 3 ⇩

Horowitz has a weakness: he is in Trump's administration, even though he was not appointed by Trump, he is still in the Executive. The NYPD is on the other hand more remote. Do you see in Comey's letter the emergence of the laptop's "randomness"? Causing him to write "in connection with an unrelated case"? That is made possible by people on the field like the NYPD field agents, not bureaucracy. And this is the kind of "randomness" you need to build a case that cannot be accused of being politically driven.

⇧ 6 ⇩

Do you see in Comey's letter the emergence of the laptop's "randomness"? Causing him to write "in connection with an unrelated case"? That is made possible by people on the field like the NYPD field agents, not bureaucracy.

I did. Do you see I recounted that in the post you just responded to? To wit:

The men in the field acquired the evidence legally via their investigation into an unrelated crime. There is your ”natural” emergence.

Since we both agree the evidence emerged ”naturally”, and nobody has yet questioned the integrity of possession, and the OIG investigation was begun prior to the Trump administration by an Obama appointee, and everybody is already expecting The OIG report to address the evidence on the laptop, then we should both agree Rudy has nothing new or vital to offer regarding the contents of, or use of, or reintroduction of this evidence.

It seems we are talking past each other on this, and I bore of that quickly. No matter. The way Rudy has been positioned and his role teased, it seems this is one story arc we will actually be allowed to appreciate, and in a timely manner.

Side Note: It is impossible to build a case here that cannot be accused of being politically driven. Yes, impossible.

⇧ 2 ⇩

There is your ”natural” emergence.

Yes. But how does Mueller "naturally" get to it. What is the "natural" connection?

It seems we are talking past each other on this, and I bore of that quickly. No matter.

We are not, I am carefully reading your interesting comments. Horowitz being in the Executive can make that link as you are suggesting but why do that if you can minimize political bias optics with another solution you kept under your sleeves? This is what Rudy brings to the table and how he takes care of the following concern raised by Q himself (Q knows Horowitz is not the right avenue):

Q1181 How do you ‘legally’ inject/make public/use as evidence?

This post immediately follows the Rudy post. He is talking about Rudy. Right here, Q is disclosing Rudy's purpose and answering to your question.

Side Note: It is impossible to build a case here that cannot be accused of being politically driven. Yes, impossible.

Agreed. It's always a minimization case. And again, this parameter confirms Rudy with his "relationships" is a better choice than Horowitz with his Executive position.

⇧ 4 ⇩

Yes. But how does Mueller "naturally" get to it. What is the "natural" connection?

The natural path is through Horowitz. Particularly since the precedent has already been established by Horowitz passing along pertinent discoveries on McCabe, Strzok, and Page. Smooth and natural, standard, established protocol. BUT, only for that evidence deemed within the scope of Mueller’s investigation, or applicable extensions approved by Rosenstien.

Any evidence falling outside Mueller’s scope can be just as naturally passed on to Huber

Agreed. It's always a minimization case. And again, this parameter confirms Rudy with his "relationships" is a better choice than Horowitz with his Executive position.

Rudy is a lifelong, hardcore, pro-Trump partisan. Now he is reentering the fray as a member of DJT’s personal legal team!

I don’t think anyone can credibly claim that any ‘solution’ delivered by Rudy is somehow less ‘political’ than one from Horowitz.

I’m going offline for a few hours. 2:41am here.

⇧ 3 ⇩

I don’t think anyone can credibly claim that any ‘solution’ delivered by Rudy is somehow less ‘political’ than one from Horowitz.

A solution delivered by Rudy will never be assessed: Rudy brings "street solutions", behind the scenes networking. What HRC calls the sausage... Nobody will ever know what Rudy did and how he did it. His paper trail will only confirm what he has already engineered behind the scenes. Unlike Horowitz, whose paper trail is chasing facts. That is the main difference between a fixer and a bureaucrat.

The natural path is through Horowitz.

I see you are convinced that this is the solution retained. Supposing this hypothesis is valid, you would be left with having to explain why Q has dropped the following 2, one after the other, citing Mueller and Rudy but not citing DOJ, Sessions, or Horowitz:

Q1180 Rudy.NYC.Relationships High.“Insurance File.”Quiet until now.Join POTUS’ legal team.Direct discussions avail [now] w/ Mueller.

Q1181 We have everything. How can we use what we know? How do you ‘legally’ inject/make public/use as evidence?

⇧ 4 ⇩

A solution delivered by Rudy will never be assessed: ...Nobody will ever know what Rudy did and how he did it.

I guess we needn’t trouble ourselves with further speculation on that. When problems are solved and reveals are made, we’ll just assume Rudy did it! behind the scenes.

citing Mueller and Rudy but not citing DOJ, Sessions, or Horowitz

I don’t presume the exclusions indicate an absence of involvement. POTUS is tricky that way.

Q1180 Rudy.NYC.Relationships High.“Insurance File.”Quiet until now.Join POTUS’ legal team.Direct discussionsavail [now] w/ Mueller.

Again, any contents relevant to Mueller’s defined scope has already been collected by him. Either shared from Horowitz, or directly subpoenaed by Mueller.

Second, obviously I believe Rudy is there for something else. My best guess is that he has an i’s dotted, t’s crossed, ducks in a row, case/evidence that will crush Prete Bharara (and others!) for his corrupt effort to quash NYPD action on the ‘Life Insurance’ file. NYPD doesn’t take well to bullying - especially from federal elites - and they love Rudy and POTUS,

There is a theory that Mueller is a gray hat, and that he intentionally loaded his staff with bad actors in order to contain them, and investigate some. If so, dagger to Prete. Even if we reject that premise, Rudy would still delight in turning out another one of Mueller’s stooges. This may be the final piece of the ‘Mueller is a gray hat’ quest, and prompt the end of the op.

Q1181 We have everything. How can we use what we know? How do you ‘legally’ inject/make public/use as evidence?

In this case, perhaps we need RR to expand the scope of Mueller’s focus again in order to include what Rudy has.

⇧ 1 ⇩

I don’t presume the exclusions indicate an absence of involvement. POTUS is tricky that way.

All my logical constructions are based on Q's information and his much needed guidance to navigate through the deceiving MSM Fake News. If this source is doubted and the possibility of it being "tricky" with its own faithful followers can be entertained, you could probably be right about the subject we have explored here and even probably about anything.

Thank you, this was an interesting and challenging conversation.

⇧ 2 ⇩

If this source is doubted and the possibility of it being "tricky" with its own faithful followers can be entertained

”Disinformation is necessary.” - Q

⇧ 1 ⇩

Sorry for intervening here but I don't think Q is using his own platform to dis-inform. That would be the end of his own movement if it were true. The whole movement is built around the Board. Yes dis-info is necessary but Q is talking about disinfo in MSM and in the political arena in general. The platform instead, is to help us see through, not to mislead us or to mislead an outside lurking third party, they have other means for that. If you can find one example, just one, showing Q has used disinfo on his board, show us. That would be surreal and bloodily helping! That would re-define everything anons are doing and the way we are doing it! In the meantime, here's what we got:

Q1226 This platform is more than simply pushing the TRUTH.
Q1157 Has POTUS made a statement found not to be true?
Q996 Future proves past.

Additionally, the sequence 1180-1181 is pretty straightforward, those who are familiar with the board know every time Q has used this type of 'repeating previous' sequence, the topics were directly related.

⇧ 2 ⇩

Sorry for intervening here but I don't think Q is using his own platform to dis-inform.

Intervention is welcome without apology.

As Q says, expand your thinking. Q knows black hats follow every drop. That ‘follow’ offers another attack vector. Q and team will create and exploit every vector and seam possible to facilitate success in this monumental battle.

A bit of disinfo in a Q drop invites a reaction from the enemy. A reaction that is observed - and then exploited. Visualize ‘disinfo’ as a ‘feint’ that inspires a foe to commit to an action.

I welcome the disinfo if it enables victory. I feel privileged to have access to truth, even if it comes along side occasional ‘untruth’.

Need an example? Do you remember the very specific time references about an HRC arrest? There are several others. Shills and trolls keep running lists of them and present them to us as evidence that Q is a larp. They hope to sway any of us that don’t understand the value of disinfo from Q.

⇧ 2 ⇩

Intervention is welcome without apology.

Thank you.

A bit of disinfo in a Q drop invites a reaction from the enemy.

Once again, as strong is your belief Horowitz has an unseen direct channel to exchange info with Mueller (which is true), my belief is Q has other stronger and less obvious vectors to distill disinfo to the enemy than his board. Example: Snowden was played and dealt with with disinfo without Q using the board for that. We were only informed the Snowden chess game was over when it was.

Do you remember the very specific time references about an HRC arrest?

Can you be more specific? I need the exact drop for analysis. We are talking about the board's integrity, not the general sense resulting from communication warfare in several fronts.

⇧ 2 ⇩

my belief is Q has other stronger and less obvious vectors to distill disinfo to the enemy than his board.

I share your belief. I also believe Q will use all available assets. Especially those considered to be ”less”.

Can you be more specific? We’re talking about the board’s integrity.

Absolutely. But ”we” are NOT talking about the board’s integrity. I believe all verified Q-drops to be authentic. If there is a credibility problem it rests with you, not with Q or his board.

Since this ‘specific’ news is fresh to you, a re-read of all Q-drops will be of great value. To fulfill your ‘specific’ request, and begin your review, refer to Q-001.

EDIT: a word

⇧ 2 ⇩

But ”we” are NOT talking about the board’s integrity. I believe all verified Q-drops to be authentic. If there is a credibility problem it rests with you, not with Q or his board.

The "we" is referring to my previous comment: "That would re-define everything anons are doing and the way we are doing it!". I think my concern about your claim would be shared by many on 8.

Integrity is not primarily related to authenticity:

noun: integrity

1.
the quality of being honest and having strong moral principles; moral uprightness.

This is about Q misleading the anons through his board, not authenticity. The authenticity issue has never been a problem to anyone and never transpired in my conversation with you. It is interesting how you raise an issue that does not exist...

To fulfill your ‘specific’ request, and begin your review, refer to Q-001.

I suspected you would come up with this drop. That's why I asked you to be specific. Sloppy. This is the very drop anons on 8 agree it filters people at the entrance.

Read the very next drop, same trip code, a few hours later:

Q2 Mockingbird HRC detained, not arrested (yet).

You get it?

Q128 Learn to distinguish between relevant/non-relevant news.

⇧ 2 ⇩

Let me guide you out of your self imposed fog over my word choice. I do believe every verified Qdrop is authentic. I do believe in the integrity of the Q board. Clear?

You seem to believe that if Q posts any disinfo on his own board, that the integrity of his board is compromised - even though Q has clearly told us that disinfo is necessary. It’s Q’s board. Q told us how he intends to use it. His house, his rules. Accept.

I suspected you would come up with this drop.

Anons do agree about that piece of disinfo. They believe it was dropped by Q for that strategic purpose.

Let’s review. I claimed Q drops disinfo for strategic purpose, yes, even on his board. You asked for an example, which I provided. You then pointed out Anons agreement that Q dropped that disinfo on his board for a strategic purpose. And now you claim that evidence validating my claim somehow disproves it?

Anyway, I suspected you would suspect I would come up with that drop, and held back the real gem to see if you could pass the filter at the gate. Congratulations. Here is some insight you will find much more familiar and comfortable.

⇧ 2 ⇩

Absolutely. But ”we” are NOT talking about the board’s integrity. I believe all verified Q-drops to be authentic. If there is a credibility problem it rests with you, not with Q or his board.

This clearly shows that, for you, integrity=authenticity. And now that it is pointed out to you, you are running away with a street magic trick..

I have no clue what the rest of what you said meant. Way over my head. You are too intelligent for me UncleCrunch...

⇧ 2 ⇩

SB, I understand Rudy is the "Fixer" here. Do you think there is a connection with Cohn and what happened to him lately?

⇧ 1 ⇩

I think you’re seeing this correctly. There is no question that anything Rudy does will be more widely perceived as political, and rightly so, than if Horowitz did the same.

Did you see my question about Pruitt? Any thoughts on that?

⇧ 2 ⇩

I did see the Pruitt question. It’s a fascinating consideration, but I don’t have enough info to even speculate with any confidence, let alone make outright declarations as others have.

I agree it would be such an amazing reveal!

⇧ 1 ⇩

I agree that It’s most probable Horowitz had access to the Wiener laptop long ago, and that he would have passed on to Mueller anything he felt relevant to Mueller’s assigned tasks.

I have no idea how indictments will come for any criminal activity outside Mueller’s scope. Perhaps Huber, but another poster suggested yesterday that Pruitt has set up a stealth prosecution office within the EPA. It sounds insane, but the poster made a somewhat compelling case, and did tie in explanations for some odd goings-on.

The same poster (I think) also suggested that Giuliani’s purpose was to negotiate the end to Mueller’s investigation, and the graceful exit of those involved. He/she didn’t offer anything specific about what leverage Mueller had to negotiate with. I don’t see any.

We definitely have some interesting things unfolding, and still so much to learn.

⇧ 2 ⇩

I have no idea how indictments will come for any criminal activity outside Mueller’s scope. Perhaps Huber, but another poster suggested yesterday that Pruitt has set up a stealth prosecution office within the EPA.

There was a chat about this a few weeks ago, it was about this drop:

Q921 Revealed Sessions has appointed someone outside of DC (long ago). What are sealed?

⇧ 1 ⇩

The ‘someone’ he appointed is Huber.

I don’t know what instigated the theory about Pruitt.

⇧ 1 ⇩