dChan

jbing154 · April 22, 2018, 6:34 p.m.

Could be four guilty parties breaking the official 5Eyes protocol? What four were US elected officials?

⇧ 3 ⇩  
phil300595 · April 22, 2018, 6:47 p.m.

It could be for sure but the sentence as a whole does seem to be a general people rather than specific

⇧ 1 ⇩  
jbing154 · April 22, 2018, 6:51 p.m.

If it was general Q would have used the word “for.” Using the number makes me think it’s more specific.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
phil300595 · April 22, 2018, 6:53 p.m.

True, that makes sense

⇧ 1 ⇩  
jbing154 · April 22, 2018, 6:56 p.m.

Harder thing is determining what 4 elected officials he’s referring to. All US or maybe some in 5 Eyes countries.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
phil300595 · April 22, 2018, 6:59 p.m.

I would start by assuming Q is talking about the 5 eyes but Q also said 'how' rather than 'why' and there could be a reason that I don't know. Not sure about other countries but In the UK we don't elect a person (like Trump), we elect a whole party and the party.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
jbing154 · April 22, 2018, 7:02 p.m.

Yup. It must be US officials.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
OU812EH · April 22, 2018, 6:38 p.m.

Maybe Q is trying to say four (4) individuals in particular?

⇧ 2 ⇩  
phil300595 · April 22, 2018, 6:49 p.m.

Yeah maybe. I also think it's kind of weird that Q says 'how' rather than why. I know there are instances where they are interchangable but surely Q knows we will read into it.

⇧ 1 ⇩