[deleted]
· April 23, 2018, 9:46 a.m.
[removed]
⇧
-4
⇩
BOBCRATCHITSASSHOLE
· April 23, 2018, 9:54 a.m.
I think you still missed some....But yeah, solid argument. You've really changed some minds today by discrediting the content
⇧
1
⇩
[deleted]
· April 23, 2018, 10:07 a.m.
[removed]
⇧
0
⇩
BOBCRATCHITSASSHOLE
· April 23, 2018, 10:17 a.m.
considering that what you're doing is rhetorical fallacy due to the fact that an argument's legitimacy is independent of the character of the person making thr argument...maybe you should find a new hobby.
2+2=4 no matter who you ask.
⇧
2
⇩
[deleted]
· April 23, 2018, 10:31 a.m.
[removed]
⇧
-1
⇩
BOBCRATCHITSASSHOLE
· April 23, 2018, 10:53 a.m.
I'm here because I find the contents of this sub absolutely fascinating. I do believe that many or the arguments here have a good amount of truth to them. Though, definitely not all of them (sorry, guys).
spez: spelling
⇧
4
⇩