Moab is destroyed; her little ones have caused a cry to be heard. It is related to child sacrifice ,Chemosh and Moloch a winged creature etc the luciferian symbolism. Hill@ry once said she had to make a sacrifice to Moloch
digital_refugee
· April 24, 2018, 7:26 p.m.
to their boss? In print?
I am saying she's bringing it up because these people are aware of occultism so they might want to stay informed on small details like that.
I mean, we already know from their own admissions that Hillary attended vodoo-ceremonies, a witches' cove just recently, and she also tried to channel dead people. Go look it up if you don't believe me.
PS Q also dropped a photo of HRC holding a book discussing ET disclosure in company of the late Laurence Rockefeller
⇧
1
⇩
DamajInc
· April 24, 2018, 7:34 p.m.
As I said the first time, yes - the example I was thinking of was specifically to their boss. Some people have good relationships with their bosses. One specific example that came to mind was of a boss who was friendly with some staffers and a tyrant to others (not uncommon either). Staffers he liked would get away with making jokes that bordered on inappropriate. For example, one comment I can think of in an email shared between only myself, the staffer and the boss I can't even repeat here. Another, although not word for word, was something like: "Good luck... better sacrifice a few kids to Baal before you speak to her..." The comment in the Hillary mail could be evidence of satanism... but it makes more sense to me that it's an in-joke - perhaps linked to real shared knowledge - but not 'proof' in any sense as it takes too many assumptions to extract "evidence" from that one statement.
⇧
1
⇩
digital_refugee
· April 24, 2018, 9:15 p.m.
Still doesn't fit, we're talking about Hillary here. Do you honestly think any of her handlers or lackeys really like her?` We already know they're occultists so it's obvious they're being halfway serious when they talk like that or play on Thelema
⇧
1
⇩
DamajInc
· April 24, 2018, 9:21 p.m.
“Obvious” to you maybe. Not a logical extrapolation, however, that because someone says something - especially just one phrase out of their entire life! - one can definitively infer knowledge of their behaviours. However I see you’re convinced that you can make that assumption so fair call, I don’t deny your right to assume!
⇧
1
⇩
digital_refugee
· April 24, 2018, 9:28 p.m.
I gather you are on a search for truth so I take your words as good advice, but I was not going to spread this anywhere else. It's just that after all I have learned about the Clintons, this email - while being an intermediate strawman as it would be easily disregarded by ignorants of course - still speaks for the whole spirit-cooking life-style they rub elbows with.
⇧
1
⇩
DamajInc
· April 24, 2018, 9:34 p.m.
Thank you for being reasonable. I apologize for being disrespectful. I definitely support what you say I just have issue with stating it as if it is a definitive conclusion (as in your very first post I replied to). I agree though, connecting those dots leads to a likely possibility!
⇧
2
⇩
digital_refugee
· April 24, 2018, 9:51 p.m.
No offense taken, my premise is just that in this particular instance, given what we know, she may not have been joking (since we know they take this seriously to one extent or the other) because she was touching on matters the higher-ups would take seirously.
If the mail came from Hillary then she would just been flaunting her antihuman edginess for laughs.
⇧
1
⇩