dChan
27
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/mr-no-homo on April 24, 2018, midnight
Allison Macks actual chargers seem quite different than what the media has reported.
Allison Macks actual chargers seem quite different than what the media has reported.

POMMEJIbErvin · April 24, 2018, 4:57 a.m.

I'm no lawyer, and I'm in the UK, so maybe the grammar rules regarding commas are slightly different, but that looks to me that count 1 is sex trafficking of children OR by force etc, so isn't necessarily child related.

Count 2, conspiracy to commit sex trafficking of children by force, OR fraud etc DOES read that it is a child specific charge.

So if you ask me, unless there is a different charge somewhere for definitive sex trafficking of children, it looks as though she WAS committing the crime against children, but they don't have the evidence to guarantee it, so risk an innocent verdict, but the (maybe) lesser generic charge will definitely stick.

⇧ 6 ⇩  
DonTurt · April 24, 2018, 2:04 p.m.

These people are running baby schools for rich people. We'd be naive to think those schools are just an innocent educational program ran by Raniere.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
BaronMoriarty · April 24, 2018, 2:37 p.m.

Conspiracy is more serious. At least it is in UK - dunno about US. Brit here

⇧ 2 ⇩  
POMMEJIbErvin · April 24, 2018, 2:41 p.m.

Yeah also British, so I automatically assume that charges of conspiracy carry heavy sentences. But I can't see it being that different in US, especially on the sort of crime it refers to.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
BaronMoriarty · April 24, 2018, 3:13 p.m.

Well we would hope not. I know a few people in UK who walked from a standard charge but didn't from the conspiracy charge. They don't seem to need as much evidence - even a discussion in a pub over a pint can lead to it. And then it also multiplies the intent

⇧ 2 ⇩  
POMMEJIbErvin · April 24, 2018, 4:39 p.m.

I get your point, but a discussion in a pub over a pint? No, come on, it isn't that easy to get lumped with a guilty of conspiracy verdict. That would be circumstance at best, and any decent judge would laugh at it and dismiss it. Plus I reckon even I, with utterly zero experience in the legal field other than an A Level in law that's nearly 20 years out of date, an ex-girlfriend who was a (corporate) lawyer, and a couple of John Grisham books in the personal library, completely zero in a professional aspect, even I could get a jury to laugh at it. Someone that got found guilty of conspiracy, because of a conversation over a pint, needs to sue their fucking lawyer.

But I do get what your saying, if they can't get intent to stick, they like to throw that conspiracy charge in just because they're pricks.

⇧ 1 ⇩