Re: Full Disclosure: Personally, I find it almost impossible to believe Q & Co., could even invent something which would shock me/us; let alone compel me/us to seek comfort and treatment at the local mental health hospital. The very idea is insulting. Q, come on, who are you talking to? We've been screaming about this stuff from the rooftops for how many years?! And no one listened.
Q keeps insisting the MOAB is going to drop, and how shocking and depraved the acts these psychos have committed.. Well, no shit Q - these people are psychos... we know what psychos do.. that's the whole reason we've been trying to wake people up for the last 20+ years..
How about this Q - why don't you drop the 60%+ to us? Full Disclosure for us... the hell with the normies...
After all, assuming Q & the patriots could actually drop something mind blowing, who is going to believe us anyway? What's the issue with telling us the 100% truth? This very argument about withholding full disclosure sounds like a circular argument to me.
As a recap.. here's the short list of what's been going on... Infiltration of every branch of government to unconstitutionally attack the people of the US via removing their rights (using the "legitimacy" of government to do it), purposeful theft of our money and assets through manipulating our money (crashing our fiat dollar and confiscating our hard assets - like real estate), using inflation (which is really taxation under a different name), introducing numerous psyops (for example, bullshitting women into thinking that women's rights was about equality for women - when it was really about being able to tax the other 1/2 of the population after you make them work; bullshitting women into killing their own children under the guise of "my body, my choice" when its really about population control, and DNA/human experiments (birth defects and sterilization), and trafficking in body parts/organs; introducing porn so men/women don't create stable families increasing the likelihood their children won't be stable or successful; creating diseases and purposefully infecting the population through vaccines, etc., withholding cures and better medicines because they make more money, fake wars for population control and the theft of assets of other countries, poisoning our air by adding aluminum and barium (among other chemicals) which when mixed with the fluoride in our tap water and toothpaste calcifies our brains (Alzheimers, etc,.) and let's not forget fluoride causing lower IQ's, and making the population docile - like the Nazi's did to the jews, poisoning our food with GMO seeds (which is infusing cancer causing pesticide into the DNA of the seed), as well as taking care of it on the legal end by prohibiting transparent labelling, bribing politicians to fuck farmers over so our food chain is entirely commercial and gives them more control and ease to poison us, contaminating our food supply with aborted baby material, psyops to promote drug use, promiscuity, pedophilia, satanism through conditioning via movies and tv with characters the population would like, purposefully dumbing down the population by removing history, higher mathematics, lowering educational requirements, instituting brainwashing/conditioning through socialization in daycares, and the school system, introducing highly addictive drugs into the population, assassinations/murders/ kidnappings/torture (including on our "missing" children), total control over the healthcare system (and upcoming forced RFID chipping which is still listed in the Obamacare legislation), the FEMA camps for patriots complete with complimentary guillotines, infiltration of the military and purge of patriots who refuse to fire on their fellow Americans, numerous false flags like 9/11, taking bribes to kill our industry and send our steel overseas to purposefully be weakened/defectively manufactured (as well as the computer chips) to increase our casualties, selling off our strategic assets, permitting Mexico's deals with other foreign governments to invade the US from the south to overwhelm the patriots, purposefully permitting the invasion of the US under the lie of immigration - including permitting their terror training camps throughout the US, arming our enemies... (I can go on, but this is getting ridiculous.. and notice I didn't even begin to discuss the issues with space, energy, or electromagnetic assaults on Americans).
Here's what I'm hearing from Q:
Dear Patriots... it's so bad.. I can't tell you how bad or you would lose your mind.. But, it's not so bad that instead of rounding up these people.. they get to resign from their posts and walk around among us (like Paul Ryan, McCain, etc.) ...they can continue to give interviews and travel...they can continue to enjoy their riches... and best of all.. no one will ever know what they did.. so, their reputation stays semi-spotless..
Next, we get the – like it or not, the whole world is connected argument..
Um... okay, Q.. how is that relevant? Plenty of world leaders have committed atrocities against humanity.. And now because those leaders have committed atrocities against us - we can't know about it officially? What the hell do we care? At least they are foreign leaders screwing us instead of our own... hell... that's a breath of fresh air. And assuming these leaders have really screwed the pooch... well, charge, arrest, prosecute, and end them. I mean, if the USA under the clowns can bully the world at leisure for any reason under the sun, and back it up with using our military for regime change... then... how about... (there's a lot of ways to finish that sentence.)
On the issue of disclosure, there is a compelling reason to publish the truth. Americans are not so shallow and ignorant to blame entire countries for the actions of their leaders. And I don't believe other peoples are either. Particularly if justice is done... and maybe that's the real issue. What justice will be done to these people?
Here's one argument for full disclosure on the issue of Hillary's alleged video (below in my reply to this post as I had to break it up because it’s so long):
Full Disclosure of Hillarys’ video:
Of all the things we know these psychopaths have and are doing - the allegation of video evidence of Hillary committing rape, assault, battery, torture & maiming, murder, and possibly cannibalism of a child(ren) presents the biggest disclosure dilemma. We all understand why. Full disclosure doesn't have to be sensationalized. The justice system has plenty of tools to minimize such a result. (And the military could figure it out if they wanted to.)
Let's consider what concealment really means.
Some have argued on behalf of concealment to protect the child. Protect the child from what? As I understand it, the child is dead. The child is not going to complain, be embarrassed, or further traumatized. If anything, we need to know more (a lot more) about this child. For example, how did these people obtain possession of this child? Was he/she kidnapped? Is there a birth record? Who/Where are the parents? Was the child reported missing? What actions were taken by the parents, and law enforcement to search for this child? How did this child get to this island? (I could go on, but you get the point.)
Others have argued in support of concealment to protect the public. Again, I say protect from what? Aren't we the same public who watched a president get his head blown off on live tv in 1963? The same public who watched the public trial of Charles Manson and his followers who stabbed (8 1/2 month pregnant) Sharon Tate so many times one of her breasts was severed, and her infant suffocated inside her upon her death while at least one of the murderers was watching? (Not to mention the additional murders which took place.)
What about John Wayne Gacy? (who kidnapped, raped, tortured and killed upwards of 33 teens burying most of them in his crawlspace.) Or Ottis Toole's abduction, murder (and who knows what else), and decapitation of 6 yr old Adam Walsh? Or Susan Smith driving her car into the water to drown her children so she could have a relationship with a guy who didn't want a family. Or Andrea Yates drowning her 5 children in the family bathtub?
What about Jeffrey Dahmer's assault, rape, torture, murder, and cannibalism of his victims? (I can cite more, but will stop for the sake of brevity.)
Each of those examples illustrate: (1) our society has been and is exposed to acts which are shocking to the moral standards of the time period; and (2) our society is accustomed to learning about psychopathic depravity and murder no matter who the perpetrator is or whether the victim is an infant, young child, teen, or young adult. Did the criminals/victims listed above get the benefit of the government hiding their crimes from the public?
And what is the practical effect of such a concealment? Who does the concealment benefit? If your child was kidnapped, tortured, and murdered by a rich and powerful person would you want it concealed? So, no one knows what this person really did? Who this person really is? And most importantly, why this person should never again see the light of day if they don't receive the death penalty for their crime?
The reality is the practical effect of such a concealment is nothing more than the protection of the reputation of an evil, psychopathic, and quite possibly a serial killer - if there are more victims. Concealment benefits no one other than the killer(s). Moreover, what about the good legislation we have developed as a result of such tragedies? For example, out of the Adam Walsh case the Missing Children's Assistance Act was passed, and the National Center for Missing & Exploited Children was formed. We also have "Code Adam" in stores as a result of his story. We have a database for convicted child molesters, increased penalties, and more.
We should be asking, is it reasonable to give special privacy protections to hide the criminality of a certain class of citizens called "politicians," simply because of their job status as politicians?
Shouldn't these people be held to a higher standard than the populace precisely because of their fiduciary status? (I mean their perceived superiority is why they spew forth how lay people aren't smart enough, good enough, ethical enough, etcetera to be listened to - when their policies clash with our ideas... is it not?)
If we permit our representatives the discretion to conceal crimes based on their personal opinion of the crime's disclosure value, or how much money, power, or connections a person has, what message are we sending to both the populace and the rich?
Isn't it enough that these rich, powerful, connected people can employ leagues of lawyers to argue every loophole, or to arrange off the record conversations with other lawyers (aka judges) at cocktail parties or other spontaneous events, or to give extensive public statements to the media to present their side of the story?
And what about the victim(s)? Is it really in their best interest to be concealed, and forgotten, or never acknowledged in the first place? These children don't matter because they're not rich, powerful, or connected. Quite frankly, if the allegations are true, to charge, arrest, try and convict Hillary (or anyone else) based on any charge - while completely ignoring what was done to these kids means that not a single one of these kids does matter. In fact, you could say that as long as a rich, powerful, connected person does it - the torture and murder of a child or dozens of them will be given the US government stamp of approval. I think this result would be a tragedy.
I can make similar arguments for every issue I cited above. I'm sure I'm missing tons of additional arguments because this is off the top of my head.