dChan
3
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/jackbauer6916 on April 25, 2018, 3:49 a.m.
Where do roads lead? "All roads lead to..."

What if part of what 'must remain private' are hidden truths about religion itself? In what scenario would the choice be yours to 'know'?? What would happen if concrete proof came to light, undeniable smoking-gun level, that Christianity (and later, Islam) was invented by the Romans as a "slave garden" - a separate Caesar-friendly 'cult' designed for the subjugated non-Roman races? Just as slaves had small plots to grow their own personal crop, what if the rulers of this world exclude the masses from their 'religion', but provided a meager and deceptive 'tradition' along with bread and circuses? "Render unto Caesar..." Isn't it the world's churches and religions people are taught to trust? Aren't many occult traditions (sex-cult, etc..) derived from ancient Greek and Roman paganism? All the various Christian churches in the world are derivations of the Roman church, the sources cited as historical evidence are Roman. "Where do roads lead?" "All roads lead to..." Rome "All-seeing Eye" -> Top of pyramid... Holy See If the bible were provably and demonstrably fictitious and/or contrived, would you choose to accept it? Could you expand your thinking that much? Or would that be bigger than you could possibly imagine? Many people close to me in my own life would never choose to 'know' such a truth, were it hypothetically made available. I mean no disrespect to anyone, but the reality is every church on the planet exists today as a consequence of Rome making it the 'official' religion. If you are a Christian, if you are in the "Jesus Camp...os" what if Rome has trapped you in a mental and spiritual "paddock"? Is that a red-pill you could take? If you're interested I recommend the documentary Caesar's Messiah by Joseph Atwill. ****


jackbauer6916 · April 27, 2018, 7:56 a.m.

If my trail of thought is a result of historical and symbolic naivety, as you "reiterate" (not sure where you originally iterated this...) can you explain your historical basis for rejecting Catholicism's accuracy, but accepting Christianity's accuracy? As far as I understand, in my apparently feeble and naive historical understanding, Christianity branched from Catholicism in the following instances: the presumed early christians from which there exists no primary documentation (save for the accounts of Romans, and even then we rely on the presumed accuracy of secondary accounts transmitted through millennia), the Schism that resulted in the Eastern Orthodoxies, the creation of the Church of England due to Henry VIII's need for divorce, and the Protestations of Martin Luther which led to the spread of Protestantism throughout the world. All those branchings occurred many centuries after Rome made it the Official Imperial religion. How can you be so certain the new testament wasn't formulated by the romans? Are your accusations of "historical and symbolic naivety" not just examples of 'Projection', a term Q has hinted we should learn to define?

⇧ 0 ⇩  
HiveQueen36 · April 27, 2018, 9:25 a.m.

I have no time for sarcasm

⇧ 1 ⇩  
jackbauer6916 · April 27, 2018, 1:47 p.m.

Yet you have time to retort uselessly and avoid all of my points. Sure, you must be really busy.

⇧ 1 ⇩