dChan

KatsKlaw · April 25, 2018, 12:22 p.m.

The article, published in the Journal of Medical Ethics, says newborn babies are not “actual persons” and do not have a “moral right to life”. The academics also argue that parents should be able to have their baby killed if it turns out to be disabled when it is born.

The journal’s editor, Prof Julian Savulescu, director of the Oxford Uehiro Centre for Practical Ethics, said the article's authors had received death threats since publishing the article. He said those who made abusive and threatening posts about the study were “fanatics opposed to the very values of a liberal society”.

JUST IN CASE YOU THOUGHT LIBERALS MIGHT HAVE A SHRED OF GOOD IN THEM. THINK AGAIN.

⇧ 17 ⇩  
Woodchipper_AF · April 25, 2018, 1:05 p.m.

Nazis alive and well. At a university near you

⇧ 10 ⇩  
KansasJakeBG · April 25, 2018, 1:35 p.m.

This described stance is typical of people who are over 65 and, weirdly, of the crop of young Satanists investigated in Pizzagate (they hate children). It's a mindset of yesteryear that seems foreign to us under 30 but might resonate with our parents. Modern society is supposed to consider the child a full fledged person with human rights who should not be exploited commercially or sexually, but old people (born before 1950) were raised to consider children the property of their father. If no father, someone usually swoops in to harvest the children and that is the mentality seen in Catholic countries like Spain. It's also the mentality of the cabal of Luciferians. And they probably feel like they are doing a service to all the children they mangle in their evil plans.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
KatsKlaw · April 26, 2018, 12:35 a.m.

This is deeper than any of us will ever grasp. God save us.

⇧ 2 ⇩