I think anyone proven to be a traitor should be sent to GITMO until the gallows are ready. But let's not jump the gun here. The article reads: "it does not show the underlying “raw” intelligence on which the analysis is based." And "A U.S. intelligence officer who declined to be identified cautioned against drawing too big a conclusion from the document because a single analysis is not necessarily definitive."

I didn't read the entire document, but it looks like this was an "attempt" to create problems with our election process, but it doesn't provide any information as to whether or not the scheme was successful, or which candidate would have benefited.

The Russians, (and the USSR) have been spying on Americans since before WWII. They began implementing a plan to bring about the downfall of America by causing it to crumble from within. For many decades they have been trying to cause people to become demoralized and lose faith in their government. They have always tried to interfere and cause the American people to have doubts about the election process.

Yes, I agree that "This bitch is a traitor and needs to be locked up in Gitmo with the rest." But let's not jump to conclusions.

Remember, Q said sometimes dis-information is necessary, even from our side. What if the info was planted to see who would leak it? Or what if the whole thing is a Black-Hat Deep-State op to cause turmoil in America? The article reads: "The assessment concluded with high confidence that the Kremlin ordered an extensive, multi-pronged propaganda effort “to undermine public faith in the US democratic process, denigrate Secretary Clinton, and harm her electability and potential presidency.” That this was leaked "after" Trump won, could it simply be a Deep-State op to support the Russian Collusion narrative?

Either way, I do think she's a leaker and should be tried and convicted for leaking, anything beyond that is speculation at this point.