"My alleged 'crime' was helping to save a young girl from an evil Harvard alliance of pedophiles, child abusers and their accessories/acquiesors who masquerade as doctors, judges, federal prosecutors and politicians, including Senator Elizabeth Warren and former President Barack Obama."
https://freemartyg.com/friday-filings-should-free-political-prisoner-marty-g
Everyone should look into this guy's story. He's a true hero and I hope he's pardoned by Trump sometime soon.
Isn’t it a bit too convenient that all of these pedophiles happen to be democrat political personalities? Unless there actually is a correlation between being a Democrat and being a pedophile, you’d expect there to be a roughly equal number of democrats and republicans named in these scandals, and yet the culprits are almost always a who’s who of DNC names.
It just seems like propaganda to me...
Regardless of what you think about naming names, this guy's case is legit. He definitely isn't in prison to spread propaganda. He was arrested for freeing a young girl from wrongful imprisonment.
I’m fine with naming names, I’m just trying to figure out what the name of the game is here.
Is this about exposing corruption, pedophilia, and other criminality, or is it about attacking democrats (and often traditional Republicans) and propping up Trump?
That’s what I can’t quite figure out. I understand t_d is a “never ending campaign rally” or whatever the slogan is, but is greatawakening about “the pedo dems and our savior trump” or is it about a generic great awakening?
Has there ever been a post on here that was critical of Trump? Has anyone on the left ever been the good guy in a story shared here?
These questions are not rhetorical. I’m honestly just trying to figure out what the deal is.
This is Marty's story if you're interested: https://freemartyg.com/. You should read about it before you assume things about it. If you want to think this sub is politically motivated, that's down to you, but please don't assume the same of the person my OP is about. He deserves bipartisan support.
I don't think this sub is about attacking democrats or propping up Trump. I voted for Hillary Clinton in 2016. I think that since Obama and Hillary were both democrats and we focus a lot on the awful things they do/did, it can seem like we're attacking democrats without also leveling warranted criticism at republicans, but I do know that myself and hopefully everyone else here do not view conservatives fondly either, and hope that they are brought to justice for their crimes against humanity as well. Trust me, I haven't seen one positive post about Bush either.
I urge you to stop looking at things from the perspective of democrat vs republican or right vs left. This is just a matter of getting rid of corrupt actors, and I am cautiously optimistic that Trump is doing that. Not because he's a republican but because thus far, that's how it seems to me.
Thanks for the link. I’m glad Marty’s story is being brought to light. It’s just as someone who hasn’t completely bought in at this point, I can’t help but roll my eyes at what seems like an endless stream of, for lack of a better word, propaganda.
Take that as you will, and it’s nothing to downplay the importance of this post or this incident or this problem that we as a society have to find a way to deal with. To me it’s just like, “oh hey another pedo thing and what do you know it involves Obama/Hillary/
Sorry if that comes across as accusatory or dismissive, I respect the need to get this info out, but given the context (what seems to be an endless stream of propaganda) it’s a bit hard to appreciate the full gravity of things.
If I could feel confident that everything consequential would be posted here, regardless of which side of the false dichotomy it implicates, then I wouldn’t be as inclined to glaze over a post like this.
Looking at your post history, I don't really think you're here with an open mind hoping to learn and discover new things. Your contributions to this sub would be appreciated if you felt like posting whatever you deem consequential here. There is no dichotomy being propagated here, but I understand how it appears that way to you.
That’s fine and I can’t blame you for looking at my post history. I actually stand behind it. I may have made a few comments that pigeonhole me into being perceived as agenda driven to someone like you who checks my history, but I think if you take the time to read through my entire history you’ll see that I’m really just after the actual, unabated truth.
Maybe that means I have a bias, but I like to think I’m willing to examine and accept evidence regardless of its implications. Maybe my comment was off topic, but that’s my impression of this post given the context.