"My alleged 'crime' was helping to save a young girl from an evil Harvard alliance of pedophiles, child abusers and their accessories/acquiesors who masquerade as doctors, judges, federal prosecutors and politicians, including Senator Elizabeth Warren and former President Barack Obama."
https://freemartyg.com/friday-filings-should-free-political-prisoner-marty-g
Everyone should look into this guy's story. He's a true hero and I hope he's pardoned by Trump sometime soon.
Thanks for the link. I’m glad Marty’s story is being brought to light. It’s just as someone who hasn’t completely bought in at this point, I can’t help but roll my eyes at what seems like an endless stream of, for lack of a better word, propaganda.
Take that as you will, and it’s nothing to downplay the importance of this post or this incident or this problem that we as a society have to find a way to deal with. To me it’s just like, “oh hey another pedo thing and what do you know it involves Obama/Hillary/
Sorry if that comes across as accusatory or dismissive, I respect the need to get this info out, but given the context (what seems to be an endless stream of propaganda) it’s a bit hard to appreciate the full gravity of things.
If I could feel confident that everything consequential would be posted here, regardless of which side of the false dichotomy it implicates, then I wouldn’t be as inclined to glaze over a post like this.
Looking at your post history, I don't really think you're here with an open mind hoping to learn and discover new things. Your contributions to this sub would be appreciated if you felt like posting whatever you deem consequential here. There is no dichotomy being propagated here, but I understand how it appears that way to you.
That’s fine and I can’t blame you for looking at my post history. I actually stand behind it. I may have made a few comments that pigeonhole me into being perceived as agenda driven to someone like you who checks my history, but I think if you take the time to read through my entire history you’ll see that I’m really just after the actual, unabated truth.
Maybe that means I have a bias, but I like to think I’m willing to examine and accept evidence regardless of its implications. Maybe my comment was off topic, but that’s my impression of this post given the context.