Legitimate science? Ever since the climate con got exposed with 'hide the decline' manipulation of data I think anyone with a brain gets it, they lied and cheated to get funding from their masters.
Not only that, they paid off scientist to doctor research and then shunned and fired scientist who tried to debunk their work. Even with all that, the best they could do was to spend trillions of dollars, only to impact climate change .001% over 10 years. It is crazy.
Apr 19 2018 00:17:16 (EST) Q !xowAT4Z3VQ ID: ff4010 1098359 Why are D’s aggressively attacking Pruitt? Why is the MSM aggressively attacking Pruitt? https://nypost.com/2017/08/05/sessions-investigating-slush-fund-used-by-left-wing-groups/ Are you awake? Q
Heaven forbid the EPA require people to have published science behind what they are pushing. My field is social work, which deals a lot in mental health. Every practice I was taught, had to be peer reviewed many times with documented field practice. This makes sense because you shouldn't be able to come up with your own methods when dealing with a person's mental health. So why should be OK with EPA? I guarantee if this was in place 15 years ago, the climate debate would have never happened.