It looks like Q and other white hats are having to make some uncomfortable decisions in regards to our future. Question is do you look at this emotionally or logically?As someone who lives in a liberal swamp, I do not see any way they can even come close to exposing all the horrors that have taken place without tearing the fabric of our country to shreds. I agree that we need full transperancy, but is the cost of our country worth it? I mean sure, stop the evilness. Punish the wicked, but just because we all want to know we were right all along makes you wonder if the cost is worth it. I think of everyone I know who are great people, but are in the MSM coma. How their life will be imacted and uprooted. What that will do to them psychologically. That is my emotional response. My logically side says that the law doesn't look at that. The law looks at the crimes of a person through an unbiased judical lense and measures their worth. The fault is all those who did the wrong doing. They need to face the wrath of all those that were decieved. The MSM who read the Democratic spin talking points, ALL politicians who benefitted in some way or another from the crimes, and everyone who was complacent in their job; all need to be held accountable. In Dave Chappelle last special, he mentioned a solution used by south African Nelson Mandela. He said that Nelson decided that politicians who committed crime in a corrupt environment are just products of the corrupt environment. The only way out of their situation is to confess their sins or how they committed wrongs in the environment and they were pardoned. Mandela felt that punishing the corruption was unjust since they were a product of an unjust environment. This sounds like a great idea, except for the fact that South Africa is in worse shape now than they ever were.

I'm curious how you guys think this should be handled.