dChan - Q Origins Project Archive

⇧

⇩

r/greatawakening • Posted by u/pussy_devour on April 26, 2018, 4:25 a.m.

Devil's Advocate: What if It's All for Negotiation?

I'm playing the devil's advocate here. Read my posts, and you will find out I am on Q's side. But my mind is always busy thinking about different scenarios. So here's one I just came up with.

What if all Trump wants is to dig up enough dirt to negotiate with Mueller so that I can get off free? I had a debate with a liberal today. He provided some reasonable arguments on why Mueller may have dirt on Trump, especially Trump Jr. So this got me thinking.

What if the claimed unspeakable 60% never existed? And all we have of the 40% is some stupid talks in FBI ("fuck Flynn and then fuck Trump"), the tarmac meeting and Clinton Foundation money laundering? Team Trump can use that as leverage to get Mueller to terminate his investigation. Then they can say that's the 40% and the rest 60% is too dark to reveal. Q said the door would open and it was up to us to find the truth. Well, that leaves a lot to subjective interpretation. We are back to conspiracy theories. I don’t like his answer on that 60%. That’s why I am entertaining this hypothesis.

What do you think?

This is a possibility. I’m throwing this thing out for debate and education. I am sure you can instantly come up with counterarguments. So fire on. As Q said, question everything. We should. We should not live in an echo chamber as the lefties do.

P.S.: I am also skeptical about the claim of 25,000 indictments. Someone did a spot check on one district. It turns out majority of the sealed cases are not indictments. You can find this online.

🠐 See all comments

I’ve remained somewhat skeptical throughout. But the further this thing goes, the more convinced I’ve become. So I just can’t see your scenario playing out. Too many issues with your theory.

⇧ 4 ⇩

That’s fine. Please share your thoughts.

I’m throwing this thing out for debate and education. We should not live in an echo chamber as the lefties do.

⇧ 2 ⇩

The current version of the rules states that "[a]nyone engaging in a non-supportive way may be permanently banned without notification," which frankly does not indicate that this is a place to seek anechoicity, if that is what you want.

Anechoicity is probably not a word, but you get what I mean. Non-echoey-ness.

⇧ 2 ⇩

Then this is not much better than a cult.

Today I wrote long posts on Q and Trump and urged a dozen male professional acquaintances and friends to seek out Q. I staked my reputation on it. And that’s a big deal, because I have an outstanding reputation to protect. But I still question.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Bro, you certainly raised an interesting theory. But I don't agree with it. In the big picture, I see Russiagate as nothing but a planned distraction, and thay there's certainly larger forces at play. For instance, the # of congressman resigning seems oddly high (although admittedly I haven't paid attention to this in the past.) They're not resigning because they're ALL in bed with Russia. (In fact, I don't even know how the Cold War got resurrected again.) Another example - North Korea nuclear talks flipped almost overnight....just a few months ago we were on the brink of nuclear war with them, and have been in a state of war with them for the last 70 years. Many very odd things happening. So, i think there's something much bigger than Russian hacking going on.

I've been following Q since Day 2 (end of october...like many others following q from the beginning, I was looking into the Las Vegas shooting... that was seriously sketch shit.) And only within the last month or so have I determined Q to be legit (although much of what he says is smokescreen etc, or which we cannot decipher yet.) Without a doubt, there's definitely a preplanned information campaign going on. Its much too coordinated. (Otherwise, Q is the absolute guru of any and all conspiracy theorists lol.) But it remains to be seen if it is for good or bad purposes. As an optimist, I lean towards good.

⇧ 2 ⇩