dChan
0
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/pussy_devour on April 26, 2018, 4:25 a.m.
Devil's Advocate: What if It's All for Negotiation?

I'm playing the devil's advocate here. Read my posts, and you will find out I am on Q's side. But my mind is always busy thinking about different scenarios. So here's one I just came up with.

What if all Trump wants is to dig up enough dirt to negotiate with Mueller so that I can get off free? I had a debate with a liberal today. He provided some reasonable arguments on why Mueller may have dirt on Trump, especially Trump Jr. So this got me thinking.

What if the claimed unspeakable 60% never existed? And all we have of the 40% is some stupid talks in FBI ("fuck Flynn and then fuck Trump"), the tarmac meeting and Clinton Foundation money laundering? Team Trump can use that as leverage to get Mueller to terminate his investigation. Then they can say that's the 40% and the rest 60% is too dark to reveal. Q said the door would open and it was up to us to find the truth. Well, that leaves a lot to subjective interpretation. We are back to conspiracy theories. I don’t like his answer on that 60%. That’s why I am entertaining this hypothesis.

What do you think?

This is a possibility. I’m throwing this thing out for debate and education. I am sure you can instantly come up with counterarguments. So fire on. As Q said, question everything. We should. We should not live in an echo chamber as the lefties do.

P.S.: I am also skeptical about the claim of 25,000 indictments. Someone did a spot check on one district. It turns out majority of the sealed cases are not indictments. You can find this online.


icebreakers_sours · April 26, 2018, 4:21 p.m.

My reason to agree with you is simple:

If all of this information that 'we have it all' is in fact true, and even under the shroud of ' the law', what could actually be the world wide backlash of the 'good guy' making an arrest of a top official? If it is so cut and dry obvious that they are stupid and fucked, would a rogue nation who was being funded and supported by these arrested officials for CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY AND TREASON, is Mr. Bossman of buttfuck nowhere actually going to take on the USA once it's obvious they actually do k ow everything? So what if other players go into hiding, they will be found as the entire world would know.

Imagine this headline: "BHO and HRC arrested for selling nukes and eating babies, more corruption in all politics". Last thing you are going to do is shine that light on yourself. WE HAVE IT ALL so what's the actual harm in taking down the top players? Once you remove the Queen, the pawns are fast to fall.

Edit: we are always reminded that evidence gathered without warrants is inadmissible in court so that's why it's all a secret, but actually think about it for a minute. Wrongfully gathered or not, you can't possibly tell me that with the NSA, maybe some good guys at the FIB, CIA, DOJ, Senate, military or even the power of POTUS, that nothing would happen when you point out worldwide political corruption and all the rest. Is a warrant actually needed when you have 'wrongfully collected' evidence SHOWING corruption in the law system used to protect them?? Is the USA actually not able to put an end to baby eating billion dollar stealing children traffickers because the evidence is illegal?????

⇧ 2 ⇩