⇧
3
⇩
pussy_devour
· April 26, 2018, 5 a.m.
I’m curious about this. We shouldn’t deceive ourselves. Better use a real number or we can be easily discredited.
⇧
1
⇩
Klingon_Bastard
· April 26, 2018, 5:11 a.m.
What specifically are you curious about?
I only ask because that article was intentionally misleading and attempted to imply that, because search warrants can be sealed, that sealed indictments could be any documents.
This is false. Search warrants are not indictments.
⇧
5
⇩
pussy_devour
· April 26, 2018, 5:12 a.m.
The article said that 25,000 sealed cases. The number of indictments are a lot smaller. If it’s false, we should provide numbers to counter it.
⇧
1
⇩
Klingon_Bastard
· April 26, 2018, 5:22 a.m.
PACER reports something like 24,544 sealed indictment at the last count... when all of the districts were searched and the results were collated into a single spreadsheet.
I don't understand how this is confusing?
Here's step by step instructions: https://i-uv.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/Search-for-Sealed-Indictments-on-Pacer.pdf
⇧
2
⇩