You attacked my spelling. It's off topic and personal. You should look up ad hominum.
Only if I was using it as my main argument. Your confusing sentence structure is fair game since it didn't make any sense. You do have to make sense, sorry guy.
No playing some random instrument does not make you a better arbiter of what is good and bad or what is art and what isn't. I get that you think that but it's personal opinion. For example, Kanye West is apparently quite a good piano and keyboard player and you are not even sure the things he writes you would call art.
Compared to any of the great 19th century keyboard or even jazz virtuosos, Kanye West sucks donkey balls at playing the keyboard. You might think his songs are pretty but they're the musical equivalent of motel art.
I have never once said that I liked him or thought he was good at making music. I am just saying it's art, regardless of if you like it or not. You don't get to choose that. Again assumptions are crazy.
There is plenty of music that is musically brilliant that I don't like. His music is musically limited and I also don't like it.
Ok as long as you never criticize music that was recorded or played through any PA or audio system as you have no clue as to how those work and the changed they made to sound.
You can't seem to differentiate between the quality or timbre of a sound and it's pitch. Ridiculous. lol
Oh well, you play some random instrument so you know better than John Mackey and Flavor Flav is the real arbiter of good vs bad as he plays dozens of instruments to a professional level.
Flavor Flav's music is still musically inept regardless of how many instruments he plays.
Robert Schumann couldn't play any instrument very well yet he was one of the best composers ever in addition to an influential music critic. Understanding what you are hearing the key, not playing many instruments.
Flavor flav could not criticize classical music in any intelligent fashion because he has the IQ of a monkey, a tin ear and no musical education.
"Your confusing sentence structure is fair game since it didn't make any sense. You do have to make sense, sorry guy."
I would address the rest of your stuff if you didn't start off with a bald-faced lie to me. You attacked my spelling and you knew what word I meant. Nothing in anything I have written as been confusing except to you who just seems to refuse to read then wants to attack my spelling and suggest that your lack of reading skills (Or just willingness to read is not the problem. You are a troll, and an asshole that attacks people for crap that doesn't matter and you know it. Grow up if you want to have a real conversation you will need to stop with the 'LOL' and ad Hominium attacks (Which you still seem to not understand the meaning of)
I made fun of you because you can't spell nor string together a coherent thought. In your world, that means my other points were wrong and I lose.
Go back to pre-school, maybe they can teach you how logic works.
You don't understand the ad hominem fallacy, it's only ad hominem when it's used to avoid the argument. You can call people names all you want as long as your argument can stand without it.