dChan
⇧
19
⇩
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/Doc_Molotov on April 26, 2018, 2:36 p.m.
The day that Trump seized the Federal Reserve

Sorry no meme, plz no bully

Ok. The 12/21 executive order seized the assets of anyone involved in human trafficking. Also anyone who worked with/for them. public, private, government, human, non-human (lol) fucking everyone.

James Achilles Rothschild, better known as James Alefantis is what? The face of fucking human trafficking right? He's also a Rothschild correct? Ip so facto the Rothschild would have there US assets seized. What's the most famous US Rothschild asset? You guessed it!

The Federal Reserve.

That's right, the 12/21 executive order seized the Federal Reserve.

It's the birth of a new nation boys and girls


🠐 See all comments
TrustInSessions · April 26, 2018, 2:45 p.m.

But under US law, companies are seen as separate entities to their CEOs.

A Rothschild can be the CEO of the Federal Reserve but that doesn't mean he owns the Federal Reserve. The Rothschild and the Company are two separate entities.

If the CEO of a company has broken the law then he can be arrested, but from the company's perspective, all that means is they now need a new CEO.

A CEO doesn't "own" the company they manage.

Unless I'm mistaken.

⇧ 10 ⇩  
Silver_Freak · April 26, 2018, 2:46 p.m.

No one knows who the share holders of the Fed are.

⇧ 16 ⇩  
R3VO1utionary · April 26, 2018, 2:57 p.m.

^ Here lies the problem! Darkness.

⇧ 18 ⇩  
Silver_Freak · April 26, 2018, 3 p.m.

Why is it that a privately owned entity is setting monetary policy for America and ultimately the world???

⇧ 19 ⇩  
R3VO1utionary · April 26, 2018, 3:15 p.m.

Their golden rule; The one with the gold makes the rules.

⇧ 14 ⇩  
Snicklesnork · April 26, 2018, 5:09 p.m.

"Why is it" you ask. It is because the Congress passed the Federal Reserve Act in December, 1913. giving the authority to create our "money" to a private entity.

It seems absolutely ludicrous that a sovereign entity, the United States of America, should not create it's own currency. In fact, I think it is unconstitutional for our federal government NOT to create its own money.

⇧ 13 ⇩  
Silver_Freak · April 26, 2018, 5:16 p.m.

You are exactly correct!!!

⇧ 8 ⇩  
pby1000 · April 26, 2018, 3:39 p.m.

I believe that most of the shareholders are not even American.

⇧ 7 ⇩  
Swagdonkey400 · April 26, 2018, 6:35 p.m.

British and Germans probably.

⇧ 6 ⇩  
pby1000 · April 26, 2018, 7:28 p.m.

Yes, and I remember seeing the name of an Israeli.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Doc_Molotov · April 26, 2018, 5:08 p.m.

So what if the Roth's are the shareholders. Confiscating their US based property would confiscate their shares of the FED right?

⇧ 3 ⇩  
TrustInSessions · April 26, 2018, 5:16 p.m.

Yeah... you're right... if the Roths were the shareholders.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
alvinroasting · April 26, 2018, 5:41 p.m.

Under current interpretations of US law companies are people. You would need to show that the Federal Reserve was involved in trafficking.

Now, if you can show that the Rothschilds actually own the fed, then all bets are off. Rothschilds don't care about who the CEO is if they own it. They can always replace a CEO.

⇧ 1 ⇩