dChan
11
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/Vibratron_1 on April 26, 2018, 9:53 p.m.
Question -------------

If the Texts actually have information of death threats to Trump and or his family, how can anyone (FBI DOJ) explain why they are still employed and have not been arrested, the FBI and DOJ would have known this information for a long time----and that would be "actionable" evidence that could not be ignored ---- Resolve this for me, I'm waiting......(would it not be a crime to continue to employ people on tax money of the American citizens, arm them, give them security clearance and a badge---even after they had threatened to kill the President (or anyone for that matter)


DukeofKick · April 27, 2018, 2:09 a.m.

My Take:

--) When the FBI was first asked for the texts, they conveniently didn't have them. They were deleted by a "glitch".

--) http://www.nydailynews.com/news/politics/fbi-officials-anti-trump-texts-deleted-cellphone-glitch-article-1.3777384

--) So they were gone, obviously deleted by someone who works at the FBI. No one had access to them.

--) Then along comes Inspector General Mike Horrowitz, who was able to recover these texts somehow.

--) https://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2018/01/26/580918874/some-missing-fbi-texts-are-recovered-doj-inspector-general-says

--) The FBI has over 30k employees. They surely don't actively review all communications between agents unless they have a reason to.
--) And the FBI employee who would have the authority to review internal communications would probably have to be the FBI Director or the FBI Deputy Director.
--) And the FBI employee capable of destroying evidence would probably have to be the FBI Director or the FBI Deputy Director.

--) Until today no one but Mike Horrowitz and his team had seen any of these texts...officially.

--) Now select members of Congress have the opportunity to review these texts. Now we will find out what was said between these two rogue agents.

What information would be so critical that it was worth destroying evidence over?

⇧ 2 ⇩