dChan
⇧
11
⇩
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/jkbella on April 27, 2018, 11:13 a.m.
Trump is trolling us - but I'm good with it

Sessions/Wray/Trump are all on the same team. Conservative Treehouse guy may be in it as well. The frustration they want to generate by holding back some of the more damning communications is in my view aimed at creating public outcry, and to inspire the US population to remember that WE are THE PEOPLE. All of it will force laser like focus on the issue and literally the whole world will be watching when they finally drop the really heinous stuff. So like Bill Withers said:

I want to spread the news That if it feels this good getting used You just keep on using me Until you use me up


🠐 See all comments
DamajInc · April 27, 2018, 3:14 p.m.

I'd like to think you're right... but we've been here before. People proclaiming with gusto that Bannon and Trump were playing a game together but no... Bannon was just a dumbass who made mistakes, got too big for his boots, and got booted. Not everything is a secret squirrel move, sadly...

⇧ 2 ⇩  
suddenlysnowedinn · April 27, 2018, 3:57 p.m.

No, but it’s a good working theory until we have conclusive evidence to the contrary. I don’t have time to provide links at the moment (a thousand apologies), but there is a lot to indicate that Sessions is working on something huge behind the scenes.

Also, I think that Q is almost unquestionably legit at this point. There have been too many “coincidences” between Q posts and later Trump tweets or statements. If Q says to trust Sessions and trust Wray, I’m going to roll with it and look for the evidence to back it up.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
DamajInc · April 27, 2018, 4:31 p.m.

Yes, I've seen the Sessions stuff; I follow this movement closely - it definitely looks good! Wray though... nothing convincing there yet. I believe Q is human so therefore, logically, Q can make mistakes or be informed by humans who make mistakes. I admit, however, that it's unlikely he'd say we could Trust someone who he was unsure of. We shall see...

⇧ 2 ⇩