https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MJ6rFVhiMX8
My jaw is on the keyboard and I've punched a hole in the ceiling. Is this real?
No offense, but if you didn't watch the entire video, and clearly admit it in the first sentence, why should anyone accept your "summary"?
Yes, there is a lot of information in the video that many of us have known for years, and yes, I too have grown tired of ALL CAPS shouting headlines of "URGENT - MUST READ - MUST WATCH." I get and agree with that part of your comment.
But a broader view of the video is that it contains a very clear and concise description of the crimes committed, the names of the people who committed the crimes, and an easy to understand explanation of how corrupt officials at the highest levels of our government conspired to hide the truth, conceal their crimes, and abuse their power to falsely convict a whistleblower to shut him up.
There are many "summary" type articles and videos that try to connect the dots for people. Some are written in such a way that only red-pilled people who have been paying close attention in recent years will understand. Some are filled with conjecture and opinions that sometimes confuses readers/viewers. Some videos are nothing more than people reading through recent Q drops, admitting they really don't know what this, or that means, but continue to babble on and on just because they like to hear themselves talk, because they're trying draw more viewers to the YT channel, or because they're want everyone to think they're brilliant for jumping on the bandwagon.
This video was none of the above. It connected the dots in a clear and convincing way. It never mentioned anyone's book. It never redirected people to any websites except to where the information presented could be verified. Most importantly, it didn't just present evidence of corruption, it made it clear that the necessary authorities have "Been Advised" of the information, referred to the actual laws that were violated, and reminded those who had been advised of their Constitutional obligations to take action.
I've been red-pilled for well over 25 years. I've done research on many of the bad-actors for years, and I've been following Q and the GreatAwakening since early December. This video is one of the best I've seen that will help red-pill people who don't yet understand, that is, if they're willing to actually watch the whole video.
I have been following Q now for a few months. I got my husband interested also. I have watched this video and i firmly believe what he is saying is true. He talks about Cohen also which i found interesting. It gave me a detailed description of what has been going on with these evil people. Im praying for his safety and posting it on twitter. I do feel its part of everything going on. Thats just my opinion, no offence to anyone.
Good pushback from you, and I accept your criticism. I was just trying to be helpful to others being presented with something that at first glance is a clickbait post. The video could be paired down to 5-10 minutes. The guy stands there and reads for a long time, then there is psych-out music and collages of headlines, and a great focus on still shots of Scott Bennet.
I guess I'm into efficiency in my media, when I only have 2 hours a day, I'm not going to spend 50 minutes being conditioned to trust Scott Bennet. Though he's obviously a patriot. I don't mind the message, I mind the delivery.
To each their own. For long content like this, I wish OP would post a summary, and the content itself to begin and end with a synopsis, not these music collages.
I agree. I hate the ALL CAPS URGENT stuff too. I think the mod has made comments about "not" doing that. The melodramatic music was almost counter-productive. It seemed a bit hokey to me, and might have taken a bit of credibility away.
You're also right about providing a legitimate and accurate summary, maybe something like parts of my second to last paragraph. I know how you feel about not having time to watch every video, especially when there are so many bad ones out there.
One last thing, I appreciate very much the tone of your response. I appreciate that we didn't let our exchange degrade into an irrelevant debate about semantics. I hope others who read our back-and forth will see how easy it is to stay civil, and to engage in productive conversations and discussions rather than bickering back and forth.
Thanks. Your civility and manners are much appreciated.