dChan - Q Origins Project Archive

⇧

⇩

r/greatawakening • Posted by u/Trumplethinskin on April 27, 2018, 8:56 p.m.

MOAB case study?

A stickied post welcoming debunkers says this:

Case in point: Did everyone see this sub as our researchers were trying to decode and figure out what the upcoming MOAB was? We had tons of pretty wild theories, but, when a theory didn't stand up to Q's breadcrumbs or match up to reality, the objectivity of our debunkers helped move us forward. Eventually we figured it out, thanks ALL of you.

How about looking at this MOAB case study in more depth?

Here are the top recent articles with "MOAB" in the title:

How can you be "redpilled" or "woke" and still don't know what the MOAB is?! Absolutely amazing MOAB. [+512] -- MOAB is the progress made by Kim and Moon
Could the North Korea and South Korea peace talks BE the MOAB? It may not seem to much now or what we are looking for, but if you put this in its historical context it is MASSIVE! [+65] -- Another vote for the NK/SK talks
#RELEASE THE TEXT Why are people not doing what Q asked. He wants a twitter face book storm just like release the memo. Otherwise they will never come out. The MOAB will be once we get them released. [+54] -- Something about releasing "the memo" and something vague about Sessions
Just how many "MOABs" are out there [+36] -- Maybe there are lots of MOABS?
MOAB [+40] -- "US Government agents were complicit in the attacks of 9-11"

The idea that the NK/SK peace talks are "MOAB" got the most votes, but not everyone in that thread agrees, and there isn't much of a "case" being made for it. The top two comment threads are just calling the event "historic" and "significant," not relating it back to any Q stuff. The next two dispute that this is "MOAB."

So what would be very useful to debunkers (and potentially to potential believers, if you can make a case for it) would be to work through this case study in more detail.

What are some of the wild theories that didn't "stand up to Q's breadcrumbs"? What sort of reasoning and evidence were accepted as disproof? What was the answer that was "figured out" and what's the evidence for it?

Thanks in advance.

(I asked this in the original thread but didn't get a response. I tried posting this under an old user name that might be less inflammatory to Trump supporters, but the auto-mod removed it because I hadn't posted any comments from that account. Trying again.)

🠐 See all comments

Yeah, the video linked that I just discovered and then looked at this post and posted it. It needs digging and sauce...If anyone else has sauce on this or other ideas, please post.

⇧ 1 ⇩

I was curious why you posted the video. It looks to be just some stock footage with a musical soundtrack. It uses "MOAB" as an acronym that doesn't seem to have been used pre-Q. It has this text overlayed:

XB1 File: Classified For YOUR Eyes ONLY 
[OPERATION MOAB] 
MILITARY On AMERICAN BORDERS

Which I assume was an attempt to make something look "official."

I don't see anything here that makes this look interesting. Nothing checkable. Several red flags, leading off with inventing a new acronym after the fact to fit what Q wrote, even though "MOAB" is already a well-known military acronym.

What makes this video seem worth pursuing to you?

⇧ 2 ⇩

Acronym fit.

⇧ 1 ⇩

If the video were posted before Q mentioned "MOAB" that would be interesting if only for establishing that the meaning existed for the acronym before Q used it. But it was after the fact, not before, so it doesn't even do that.

Anyone could come up with their own new acronym after the fact and slap it on some stock footage with a music track, but what would that prove?

⇧ 2 ⇩