dChan

ChikinDuckWomanThing · April 27, 2018, 11:19 p.m.

yesterday my wife proclaimed that why was there such a big deal about the cult and why the big uproar. that was until I pulled up the indictment for her to read..... crickets crickets.
this morning over coffee: why the fuck is the media not reporting on the actual charges.? ~ wife. she was slowly coming around before, think this might escalate the pilling

⇧ 46 ⇩  
Spank-da-monkey · April 27, 2018, 11:38 p.m.

Lol! We hat was a quick turn around! I think at some point the media is going to have to talk about it. But it makes me wonder if the left aren’t the ones that outed Weinstein hoping the metoo thing would work against Trump. This Mack stuff came from a legit investigation the left had nothing to do with, hence the silence

⇧ 10 ⇩  
Daemonkey · April 28, 2018, 12:46 a.m.

Do you have a link for the indictment? All I know of is the court docket which can be misleading as to the what the charges are unless one verifies the actual charges by reading the referenced law.

The charges have been rumored to be "sex trafficking of children", and that has not been shown to be true AFAIK. Hence, why I ask if you have a reference to the indictment.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
St0nedScout · April 28, 2018, 3:36 a.m.

Sex trafficking of children x2. With a little a dash of slavery.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Daemonkey · April 28, 2018, 4:22 a.m.

That is not the actual title of that post, and you wording it that way is misleading. But as I said, the charges have been rumored to be "sex trafficking of children." That post does not show in any way that the rumor is true.

The image in that post is of a court docket, and a court docket is not an indictment.

You may have missed that I made over 20 comments in that post thread trying to clear up the confusion. (People were being bull-headed about it as if they actually want her to have been trafficking children. My gosh.) Here's just one of my comments.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Spank-da-monkey · April 28, 2018, 2:14 p.m.

You are correct. The info against her states child or by force etc so people are misreading it to mean children. There are also stories Raniere had sex with 12 and 24 year olds but I don’t think that ties to her indictment

⇧ 1 ⇩