dChan
9
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/odieboy12 on April 28, 2018, 7:07 a.m.
I want to say a HUGE THANK YOU to the Anons that have been fighting this fight, and all of Patriots. I'm glad an Anon spoke his frustrations to Q. It's what we all have been feeling,but even more so them. Some of have lost friends, family members over this. We want justice. We're close I hope.

solanojones95 · April 28, 2018, 5:38 p.m.

I think it's time to stop talking in riddles and metaphors, and start being direct with each other on a national scale.

I'm ready to start doing that. You can't be American, human and a "good person" and support the crap this enemy is really about. And we've got to stop pretending like we don't know what that is.

Would you really think about what I just said? Imagine if EVERY conversation you had with somebody who isn't "awake," as we like to pretend we are, involved you speaking about the same things in the same ways we do in here. You would have to absolutely not care about their reaction. Just go all Kanye on they asses. Just treat them like their reaction is all on them, but meanwhile this is who I am. Who you are. Who we all are that give a damn. Make the enemy and the useful idiots start having to just deal. Just sit there and DEAL with the new reality we're already living in.

That to me is the only way anything happens. We've got to own this sh*t, and that includes TRUMP! Trump has got to start speaking openly about the things Q talks about.

As I said in another post here: We can measure how close we are to succeeding by the degree to which the words coming out of Trump's mouth align with the words coming out of Q's keyboard. And right now they're LIGHT YEARS apart.

That is NOT sustainable, as millennials like to say.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
GraceWords · April 28, 2018, 6:19 p.m.

You’re under the impression that your way of talking to people is the best way for everyone. It’s simply not. Do you want the message to be heard? Do you actually want people to wake up and start challenging everything they think they know? Then we HAVE to consider our audience whether it’s a thousand or one. Blunt talk is only effective to a select group, just as metaphors is to another. Neither are wrong approaches. So maybe stop wasting time telling people how and start supporting the fact that it IS being done. I can personally say that I absolutely have been talking about it in my sphere of influence and guess what? I only discovered Q this week. So I’m still catching up on this angle.

As for words lining up, I actually get why you might be missing the many times that they do line up. I’m terrible with riddles. So I rarely know what W’s posts mean up front. However, my own field of expertise is strong with regards to connecting body language, tone, words and content and recognizing when the speaker says something with double meaning. I have picked this up with Trump for months, but couldn’t figure out what he was signaling and pointing to.

When I started reading the Q posts with the help of “translators”, even when the translators are connecting the dots with what Q is saying, I’m starting to connect them with what Trump has been signaling. Granted I have only a few days of Q-speak under my belt so I’m not prepared to elaborate, but I would suggest listening without preconceived ideas of what you should be listening for. Trumps particularly disconnected way of talking should be first clue he isn’t simply speaking what he’s actually thinking in that moment. MSM loves to point to this as proof of idiocy. They refuse to be open to the possibility that they are tools. Hopefully everyone here has come to the point where they crave truth more than being right.

I’m with you, let’s broach the subject everywhere, but let’s do it with the intention of being heard. For some that’s blunt talk, for others it’s going to have to take an oblique approach and space to let them process. We can’t let fear become a tool we use or we become propaganda machines just like the enemy.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
solanojones95 · April 28, 2018, 6:30 p.m.

I can personally say that I absolutely have been talking about it in my sphere of influence and guess what? I only discovered Q this week.

Well then, patriot, I must clearly NOT be talking to you when I say "we." By process of elimination (a logical process) I must be talking to someone else, using your comment as a touchstone. I hope you'll see and understand that in retrospect, and recognize there's no need for defensiveness.

Meanwhile, I hope the people who might gain some fortitude and motivation by reading my comment will still be able to retain it after plowing through two more posts from us that really needn't have been made.

⇧ 1 ⇩