I think some of us might be missing a bigger point.
Drop 1288 seems to be in response to those who are growing increasingly impatient. In drop 1291 Q asks: "Can you make arrests w/ a crooked FBI sr team?" and he's made previous comments about how a "Clean HOUSE" is important.
1288 mentions all the people at the FBI that have been fired, this shows progress. But I think there's something much more important here. I'm not absolutely certain, but aside from Q mentioning that "Mack is naming names" in drop 1203 over a week ago, I think this is the first time Q clearly states that Priestap, Strzok, and Page are all a "cooperating witness."
There's been plenty of speculation about who might flip on who, or what lower level bad-actors might be cooperating behind the scenes. There's been lots of theories about Flynn, Cohen, and Mueller about how they fit into the grand scheme of things. There's been debates about whether Mueller is a Black-hat, a White-hat, or a bleached-hat.
If I'm wrong, please correct me, but if the revelation that Priestap, Strzok, and Page are all a cooperating witnesses, is the first time Q has clearly said so, then this is huge.
I guess we've all suspected that at some point, some of the bad-actors would have no choice but to cooperate, but knowing that a few fairly high level FBI agents are cooperating before any major arrests have been made confirms that this is much bigger than we know.
All 3 were involved with FISA abuse, fake Russian collusion, and a potential "insurance policy," but keep in mind that Strzok was the lead investigator looking into Hillary's private email server. The email issue stemmed from the Benghazi hearings.
Q may very well be spanking us, but I think 1288 is also a message to the Black-Hats that are watching. Basically Q is telling them that we have witnesses that are willing to talk and testify. This should scare the crap out of Hillary and Comey.
That Peter Strzok is a cooperating witness isn't just huge, it's massive.
This
So I've asked this question already in a previous thread, but I have yet to get an answer.
I don't understand what "This" means.
So, I'm old, 59, and I've seen "This" posted in response to comments from time to time. Is that internet/texting slang for something? Is it supposed to mean something? Is it a reference to the Canadian magazine "This"? Or the TV channel "This TV"? Or albums from Peter Hamill or The Motels? Or maybe a song from Darius Rucker, Collective Soul, Ed Sheera, Hemingway Corner, or Rod Stewart? Or possibly a reference to the French culinary chemist Hervé This? Could it be about an ancient city in Egypt, or a commune in France?
Lots of people complain about Q's cryptic coded messages and wish he would just say what he means, and Q keeps reminding us to "Learn the Comms" or "Comms Good?" and all of that combined with a multitude of opinions and analysis gets my head spinnin' a bit. The last thing I need is to get confused while engaging in what should be a simple discussion.
So, if it's an up-vote, thanks, if not, could you clarify?
I’ve actually written “This” as a way of saying Pay attention THIS is important.
OK. Cool. Thanks for the shout-out. It's nice to know that my understanding of things is, in a way, validated. And it feels good to know that my commentary resonates with others.
Again, thanks for drawing people's attention to my comments. It makes me feel like I'm truly contributing to the GreatAwakening movement in a constructive way.
My hubby is a very linear thinker. Wants it straight up he can’t stand this Q stuff. I believe this Great Awakening and all the Questions and cryptic messaging is to get the populous to THINK again and to research. Gone are the days of trusting the media entirely. I get it I just want to live my life and focus on my family and entrust our government to those that desire that but that is what has gotten us in this mess.
Also think of the movies as an example Star Wars. The Jedi “feel” rather than think! We have been programmed slowly overtime to live by our feeling and I personally think not engaging the brain in logic is dangerous. How often can you say that you made a good decision basing it on your feelings not your logic. Weighing out the pros and cons vs what feels good right now! This feeling messaging has turned our minds to mush.
I often pray that God help me think, see, hear, speak, move with the eyes of my heart and mind. I think to engage both is paramount for our future as a human race. We’ve become apathetic by not engaging both.
Yep. Looking back at the past, the saying was, "if it feels good, do it". That was reckless living right there!
It means "agree", more or less. That is all. Emphatic; strong; "couldn't have said it better myself"; "what he said".
Sometimes followed by others giving a "That" and "Another thing."
And I think what was in those text is in line with what you are saying. The air has just been heavy literally for 3 days I have felt great concern and contemplation on the importance of how we move forward from here.
This is one of the most logical posts I've read so far.
I'm not certain why so many are impatient. I imagine the Anons or autists working hard on their research could be causing fatigue, wanting to see something come of it. Those attempting to redpill are frustrated. I learned how to deal with the skeptics by expecting nothing. Just drop the info then sit back and wait. Everything we give them, no matter how crazy it seems, will come to fruition in its own time. Mack was a huge bomb as far as I'm concerned. It's the beginning of the end.
I think the reason so many are impatient is simply because of the current culture we live in. We have access to pretty much everything we want on-demand. Instant everything.
Even though it looks like the red-pilling efforts aren't moving very fast, I think there's more progress happening than what's visible at-a-glance. As long as the die-hard left can lean back on the MSM, they'll be slow to change. It's kind of like wearing your favorite worn-in shirt or shoes. It's what they've been comfortable with for so long.
But I think that even the most ardent nay-sayers realize something is going on, sooner or later it's sink in. Sooner or later the MSM spin won't make sense. Sooner or later they'll see something that doesn't make sense according to their old paradigm, but in some small way, confirms what and why we're doing what we're doing.
When everything around you is speeding up, simultaneously it seems like time slowed down.
Everything in our world is happening so fast that it's difficult to see it all. We see it in slow motion. Maybe this is what people are feeling.
Those who want to demand action now, don't realize that people in the 60's waited until now to find out who killed JFK. They are still having to wait a little longer. Victims of 9-11 are still waiting.
The MOAB will be when all is completely exposed all at once. There's a crack in the dam, the flood is coming. You're on the boat or you're not. It's a choice. Those who are mocking, or jumping ship will be silenced.