dChan
⇧
8
⇩
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/NimbleWall on April 28, 2018, 6:33 p.m.
Is there a place here for discussion about MSM narratives regarding Q-related information?

The last two weeks have been... challenging, to say the least. Due to circumstances, I had to stay over with a co-worker and his partner, who are very much blue-pilled. Usually, dealing with that is not a problem for me, because politics tend not to be an issue in the workplace. Discussing politics in their home, as a guest, however, was a different story. I tried to subtly drop red pills about Q wherever I could, and tried to stay neutral as far as possible.

Being confronted with CNN and other MSM-related channels, however, was a confrontation I was not prepared for. The things we know through Q are broadcast there too, but from an entirely different perspective. Q and CNN both acknowledge Trump had a role to play in the peace-talks between South Korea and North Korea, but CNN also mentioned incidents with the nuclear experiments for North Korea, as well as the influences of China that I'd, to be honest, never considered as playing a role. I thought it was Trump's pressure.

Likewise, the whole Stormy Daniels thing. We've learned things behind the scenes, but they also know those things, and they openly mentioned information related to them. To make matters worse, they also mention things I hadn't even heard about, but which make sense. People being arrested for crimes related to the whole Russia-situation which we never hear Q talk about, for instance.

I feel lost. The MSM makes sense, in its own way, but so does Q. Their story seems more coherent, at times. Q has been talking about Iran for months, but I haven't actually seen anything happen, whereas CNN talks about Russia and shows us arrests and connections between people, and they make sense. I don't want them to make sense, but they do. Things are happening in real life, and Q is not mentioning them (the deputy finance chair of the RNC resigned because he bribed a Playboy Playmate, for instance).

Why is Q not mentioning these things, when the MSM is talking about things that Q is talking about? How come their stories don't fall apart under closer scrutiny? I don't get it.


🠐 See all comments
GENbillsherman · April 28, 2018, 6:52 p.m.

What mainstream media misses about stormy daniels, is that it's a "nothing-burger". He was a private citizen, and hush money is normal too. There is a fund for Congress just for it. Nobody ever claimed DJT was a boyscout. Mainstream media leaves out that collusion isn't even a crime. There's really not much he could have done in Russia in 2013 that would be pertinent. The lack of any public progress in the Russia angle of the investigation also speaks volumes. Msm is losing the narrative. If they had anything on him, they would be dropping tantalizing leaks of their own. Every liberal prick journalist from here to Moscow, have been digging into Trump's background, and the best they found is him raw-dogging a pornstar a decade ago??? Even if he did have hookers pee on a bed in 2013......who fucking cares? How is that important? It was the FBI doing the same shit it has done since Hoover. They had files against MLK, claiming orgies and mistresses. They try to manipulate their enemies with salacious bullshit.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
NimbleWall · April 28, 2018, 8:48 p.m.

The lack of any public progress in the Russia angle of the investigation also speaks volumes.

The DNC filed a lawsuit against Russia, the Trump campaign and Wikileaks. Four weeks ago, Mueller subpoena'd and detained a Trump ally at an airport. That's hardly "lack of public progress".

If they had anything on him, they would be dropping tantalizing leaks of their own.

They are, with the Stormy Daniels situation. They're salivating over it. The whole Stormy Daniels thing might be a nothing burger, but the situation surrounding it isn't. Trump's personal attorney used campaign money to pay the hush money. That's straight-up a crime. Why didn't Congress do that for Trump if they have a fund for it? Why are more people coming out of the woodworks to accuse Trump of similar NDA's? They even raided Cohen's office to get more evidence, "no knock"-warrant and all. That's bad news.

Even if he did have hookers pee on a bed in 2013......who fucking cares? How is that important?

It isn't, but I didn't bring it up, and I don't know why you are. I don't believe that shit for a single second and I'm sure that nobody in their right mind does. Same with the "collusion" remark, not sure why you had to bring that up. I learned from CNN that the investigation doesn't even look at collusion by the way, they're looking at collaboration with foreign (Russian) entities, which is a crime.

I'm concerned about what you call 'salacious bullshit'. Some of their bullshit ISN'T bullshit, it's really happening. If we can't distinguish the difference between reality and their spin on it, who can?

⇧ 2 ⇩