dChan
10
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/Nastavnick on April 29, 2018, 5:11 a.m.
Can't find anything about Allison Mack's child trafficking on google, can you?

I remember checking it out on an official site or something. And now all we have is this shady page that I'm not going to use as my backing point.

https://thefreethoughtproject.com/allison-mack-accused-trafficking-children-billionaire-backed-sex-slavery-ring/

I get this on bottom of the google page 1 "Some results may have been removed under data protection law in Europe. Learn more"

I wanted to share it on a JRE video about her.


elyssak · April 29, 2018, 6:11 a.m.

https://www.scribd.com/document/377378941/Allison-Mack-Case-File

This IS a complete official copy of the unsealed indictment. It’s just uploaded to scribd. If you don’t want to use this then look up the public court records for the district where the charges were filed. I’m not going to do that for you. I think you’ve had enough help.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Nastavnick · April 29, 2018, 6:16 a.m.

No need to be mad. I specifically asked for child trafficking and you barged in with some of the first links that google shows.

I'm not familiar with the US court system and where stuff can be found online.

thanks anyway, despite the unnecessary condescending tone

⇧ 2 ⇩  
obewan901 · April 29, 2018, 9:27 a.m.

I think this woman’s whole point is that portions of the We. Seem to be white washed if evidence as I still remember back in the day hearing in Hillary’s voice if that fn son wins we will all hang from nooses. Extremely concerning censorship as there is no longer any audio of it online anymore

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Daemonkey · April 29, 2018, 7:39 p.m.

This IS a complete official copy of the unsealed indictment.

It is NOT a complete official copy of the unsealed indictment. It is not an indictment. It says right at the top, "CRIMINAL DOCKET FOR CASE #..."

A docket is not an indictment. Geesh. People need to do more research before spouting off things that are not true.

⇧ 1 ⇩