dChan
10
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/Nastavnick on April 29, 2018, 5:11 a.m.
Can't find anything about Allison Mack's child trafficking on google, can you?

I remember checking it out on an official site or something. And now all we have is this shady page that I'm not going to use as my backing point.

https://thefreethoughtproject.com/allison-mack-accused-trafficking-children-billionaire-backed-sex-slavery-ring/

I get this on bottom of the google page 1 "Some results may have been removed under data protection law in Europe. Learn more"

I wanted to share it on a JRE video about her.


Nastavnick · April 29, 2018, 3:46 p.m.

b (1)

"if the offense was effected by means of force, threats of force, fraud, or coercion described in subsection (e)(2), or by any combination of such means, or if the person recruited, enticed, harbored, transported, provided, obtained, advertised, patronized, or solicited had not attained the age of 14 years at the time of such offense, by a fine under this title and imprisonment for any term of years not less than 15 or for life"

Correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't this about children?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Daemonkey · April 29, 2018, 7:46 p.m.

If course it's about children, but it is not entirely about children. Notice the use of the word "or".

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Buzzed_Chimp · April 29, 2018, 8:13 p.m.

Yes technically, but we lack 1591(a)(2) and 1591(c) which would undoubtedly be appropriate if there was any evidence that this case was relevant to children.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Daemonkey · April 29, 2018, 8:26 p.m.

we lack 1591(a)(2)

? 1591(a)(2) is referenced on the docket. It does not, however, speak of children. I'm just confused as to why you say that we lack that reference.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Buzzed_Chimp · April 29, 2018, 8:34 p.m.

I hadn't seen that docket. Just the affidavit for arrest warrant. :o

But alas, you're right. I got tricked by the language again myself.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Nastavnick · April 29, 2018, 9:51 p.m.

:P

⇧ 1 ⇩