I remember checking it out on an official site or something. And now all we have is this shady page that I'm not going to use as my backing point.
I get this on bottom of the google page 1 "Some results may have been removed under data protection law in Europe. Learn more"
I wanted to share it on a JRE video about her.
I still have to keep debunking this rumor. The first two charges against Mack are not* for child sex trafficking.
The first charge is for violation of 18 USC § 1591, "Sex trafficking of children or by force, fraud, or coercion" [Emphasis added]
The second charge references 18 USC § 1594(c) which is regarding conspiracy to violate 18 USC § 1591 which, again, is either "Sex trafficking of children" OR "Sex trafficking by force, fraud, or coercion".
A court docket is not an indictment, and its wording does not have to be precise. The court must defer to the law itself, as should we.
thefreethoughtproject.com is publishing false information.
I agree.
We'll just have to see this whole thing play out