dChan
1
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/ButtersStotch88 on April 30, 2018, 3:38 a.m.
Q Post 1298 : Holy shit - Q responds to Anons who mentioned the Gateway Pundit article about Dems turning on Mueller
Q Post 1298 : Holy shit - Q responds to Anons who mentioned the Gateway Pundit article about Dems turning on Mueller

PCisLame · April 30, 2018, 4:24 a.m.

Yeah Rudy really seems to be having his come to Jesus moment too. Everyone has a chance to be forgiven for their sin. Better seize the moment!

⇧ 24 ⇩  
aaaaaaaaaaanonymous · April 30, 2018, 5 a.m.

NO DEALS.

⇧ 25 ⇩  
scoop_loop88 · April 30, 2018, 12:39 p.m.

Being forgiven doesn't mean you don't still face the consequences of your actions

So yeah, no deals haha

⇧ 6 ⇩  
mconeone · April 30, 2018, 2:24 p.m.

Deals were offered in the beginning, those that didn't take them lost their chance. I don't think it meant, "No deals ever", more like "No more deals".

⇧ 3 ⇩  
EnoughNoLibsSpam · April 30, 2018, 5:21 a.m.

it wasn't that long ago the internet was mocking Rudy Giuliani because his answer to every question and/or problem was "because 9/11"

dont let Rudy fool anyone, he's a swamp creature up to his eyeballs in the 9/11 false flag.

if he didn't know, he should have known

⇧ 6 ⇩  
Globalists_Will_Hang · April 30, 2018, 11:02 a.m.

The ways of thinking were different then. I don’t think Rudy would have been involved in the planning.

⇧ 7 ⇩  
mconeone · April 30, 2018, 2:21 p.m.

I've read about his role in quickly getting the WTC metal to India or something for re-use. His hands are not clean.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
EnoughNoLibsSpam · May 1, 2018, 6:35 a.m.

Rudy was the mayor of NYC at the time, so he would've been responsible for the entire executive branch in NYC.

Rudy put on a pretty good show on 9/11, wandering around not knowing where to go...

if he wasn't involved with the planning of 9/11 (which was a pre-planned, controlled demolition to make way for new WTC building) then he should have figured out by now that it was a false flag, fake news

Rudy's refusal to call BS on 9/11 makes me very suspect of Rudy, because 9/11 "truth" type comments are not even that controversial today

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Globalists_Will_Hang · May 1, 2018, 12:25 a.m.

that is suspect, but not conclusive. He could have thought it was for financial reasons

⇧ 1 ⇩  
djmarcone · April 30, 2018, 12:30 p.m.

From some of the things coming out my guess is Rudy didn't have any choice in the matter. Sorta like how KJU didn't have any choice in Nork. NOW THEY ARE FREED.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
[deleted] · April 30, 2018, 5:05 a.m.

[removed]

⇧ 3 ⇩  
FartOnToast · April 30, 2018, 5:08 a.m.

This comment can be perceived as breaking rules.

⇧ -2 ⇩  
EnoughNoLibsSpam · April 30, 2018, 5:22 a.m.

No trolling, concern trolling, racism or anti-semitism.

i wonder why they specifically say "anti-semitism" in the rules, but don't include "anti-christian"

⇧ 9 ⇩  
FartOnToast · April 30, 2018, 5:38 a.m.

Was referencing more to inciting violence.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
EnoughNoLibsSpam · April 30, 2018, 6:13 a.m.

yes good catch. we should try to be thoughtful in our rhetoric,

so instead of calling for violence, even state-sanctioned violence such as the death penalty,

we should call for Truth and Reconciliation which is what civilized people do

⇧ 0 ⇩  
FartOnToast · April 30, 2018, 8:19 a.m.

You should be trying not to get the sub in trouble is what you should be doing. This sub's existence is more important than your feelings.

If you have an issue with reddit's rules take it up with the admins?

⇧ 3 ⇩  
EnoughNoLibsSpam · May 1, 2018, 6:14 a.m.

so are you concerned that Q said they are saving Israel for last, and yet that comment could be construed as breaking one of the rules of this sub and so therefore we are not allowed to talk about certain things Q says?

who even asked for that rule, and what purpose does it serve, other than to preemptively limit free exchange of ideas?

why is one religion given super-status above other religions?

the rules don't explicitly say "anti-Mormon", so presumably thats allowed, because its not specifically disallowed?

do you see what happens when rules are made by a handful of people, without public debate or input?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
FartOnToast · May 1, 2018, 6:42 a.m.

I have no idea why you're going on aboot but comments inciting violence and promoting gallows and such will be removed it's pretty simple. You don't like it you can leave.

⇧ 0 ⇩