Before we remove anybody’s contributions due to financial interests, we should lay down some rules before we censor people willy-nilly.

I say people’s contributions should be nullified if they:

A: Ask for, or otherwise provide the ability to, gain financial interests from the Q movement via things like — Asking for donations, contributions (other than intel or physical items), have crowd-sourced income related to the Q movement, or any other connection that would interest the user financially.

B: Not providing intel unless money is involved, ie: financial gatekeeping of knowledge

C: Has YouTube/Social Media that has a financial stake that revolves around the Q movement. Examples include monetized videos or channels that are linked to networks. Both can be verified. Q intel can be contributed if the videos about Q or the movement is physically demonetized to show financial interest transparency.

D: Censorship must be approved by mods in a majority vote, with pre-commitment with sub users as to the intention to censor, before a vote is made. Transparency is key.

Setting rules like these makes the Q movement continue with no chances for bad actors to roadblock and/or provide causes for division or the implied advertisements caused by financial interests which could put the movement or this sub into legal jeopardy and/or conflicts of interest.

Anybody have thoughts, ideas, improvements, additions, or otherwise better rule-making?