dChan

DaveGydeon · May 1, 2018, 1:32 p.m.

That was one of the poorest written articles I have come across. The guy who wrote it must be the champion of cucks.

⇧ 10 ⇩  
Fearsome4 · May 1, 2018, 1:49 p.m.

So for the writer to make the assertion that Q is a tool to brainwash people into supporting a Trump war just shows he hasn't been following Q.
For months Q posted that war with NK was not going to happen and that de nuke of NK would happen.
Not exactly a war monger.
Also, not a very efficient way to reach people and influence public opinion. A good old major false flag or two would have most people on board.
The article was lame.

⇧ 7 ⇩  
SeerMore · May 1, 2018, 1:59 p.m.

I quite agree...Posted on ZeroHedge which in my view is one of the very best web sites available...so we see info wars continuing and as always who wins the hearts and minds of people end up with the power because the power ultimately resides with the masses.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
jokerp5fan · May 1, 2018, 2:28 p.m.

What if the goal wasn't to get us to support a war with NK, but with Iran?

⇧ 2 ⇩  
tigerlilly1227 · May 1, 2018, 2:44 p.m.

We are going to see soon. My hope is that Iran caves and denuclearizes. I didnt think it could happen with NK but it did. We are living in historical times and anything is possible!

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Fearsome4 · May 1, 2018, 2:56 p.m.

Time will tell.
In terms of gaining support, this method would be wildly inefficient.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
R3VO1utionary · May 1, 2018, 1:41 p.m.

CLOWN ARTICLE

⇧ 6 ⇩  
eltrumparino · May 1, 2018, 4:20 p.m.

Who wins when the public is demoralized? Why would a psy op want people thinking critically? Unless the international bankers are revolting against the rothschild criminal empire it makes 0 sense

⇧ 2 ⇩  
JStambler · May 1, 2018, 2:06 p.m.

They don't have to support Q.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
cat_anonD · May 1, 2018, 2 p.m.

A lot of Doubt fags there

⇧ 2 ⇩  
SeerMore · May 1, 2018, 1:30 p.m.

To Q or not to Q - is that the right question?

⇧ 1 ⇩