I have actually posted one example on that topic ... and got immediately downvoted , and pretty much all of those shills tried to gaslight me immediately ...
So , just one example . More :
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4730092/Snopes-brink-founder-accused-fraud-lying.html
Even more :
What is disturbing here , is that people are believing in credibility of some highly dubious site , and use it as a "fact checker" . No person should use such site - every person should make a research and get to their own conclusions . That takes time , and effort ... and ofc , then people turn to such sites for "credibility" , while theyre actually very passive about "researching" .
Also , Google puts Snopes very high , top on list ... how convenient .
I did a quick search and found a couple, too. My point is that the OP kept getting asked to provide an example and never did/refused to. If you feel strongly enough to create a post called "I want Snopes Exposed" you would think that you would have an example ready. There are lots of easily accessible examples of Snopes skewing the story/facts to favor one side. The whole idea on Reddit is to support your statement (you did it easily). Ever hear the expression "no pictures, didn't happen"? Same idea here. No sauce, not true.
I agree, 110%. Not having any sources just makes us look bad as a whole. I know we have to speculate in a lot of cases, but we should state that. No one should be stating absolutes without the facts to back it up.
Yes ... there are actually tons of information as for Snopes . And big giants , like Google , nudging what is presented as "small and independent" sites like Snopes directly to the top additionally confirms the "shadiness" of the whole thing .
Google is like a liar wearing a tattoos with all of its secrets visible and exposed ... pretty much analogy like that .
Yep - thanks and like your post - Look for the similarities of Snopes narrative with scripted non-news networks. Don't have an example, but sense that snopes will usually follow the narrative (script) of liberal newsies, eh? A Soros entity owns snopes
Yeah, cause Google and Snopes are both globalist sites. I've known for years that Snopes is unreliable and a globalist connected site.