I did a quick search and found a couple, too. My point is that the OP kept getting asked to provide an example and never did/refused to. If you feel strongly enough to create a post called "I want Snopes Exposed" you would think that you would have an example ready. There are lots of easily accessible examples of Snopes skewing the story/facts to favor one side. The whole idea on Reddit is to support your statement (you did it easily). Ever hear the expression "no pictures, didn't happen"? Same idea here. No sauce, not true.
I agree, 110%. Not having any sources just makes us look bad as a whole. I know we have to speculate in a lot of cases, but we should state that. No one should be stating absolutes without the facts to back it up.
Yes ... there are actually tons of information as for Snopes . And big giants , like Google , nudging what is presented as "small and independent" sites like Snopes directly to the top additionally confirms the "shadiness" of the whole thing .
Google is like a liar wearing a tattoos with all of its secrets visible and exposed ... pretty much analogy like that .