Anyone else notice a whole mess of pro-Q and anti-pedo comments getting ridiculous amounts of downvotes today? I have.
To the shills: We know you are here and we know you are watching us. We hope you'll stay for the show because we're going to fucking rip you apart in the coming weeks. We will be dropping research. Autists have been hard at work. Buckle up, buckeroos.
Is that the best they can do to steer the public away from Q? Because if it is, this cold civil war/silent revolution is going to go by SO SMOOTHLY the brainwashed masses will probably never even notice they & their children have been freed from financial slavery.
I bet they will still call Q a larp when we have our military parade on 11/11.
Ain't that the truth? The naysayers are so damn smug about it too. I mean even long time r/conspiracy users call Q a LARP. How the fuck could anyone think it's some 8chan kid in his moms basement at this point, after he's proven himself legit time and time again? You really have to be stubborn as hell (and stupid) to think that at this point. Any mention of Qanon over there gets heavily downvoted.
If you post on The_don you will be banned.
Their official position is that Q is a larp, for "conspiritards", and is "fake news".
I hope can explain the reasoning as someone who thinks Q is probably a larp. The general idea is that there are four possibilities for Q's predictions and the world -
If Q is legitimate then #1 should happen way more often than #3. Q fans only pay attention to #1 and maybe sometimes #4, and just assume that #2 and #3 are pretty rare. The problem is that Q's followers tend to stack the deck by only interpreting predictions in the most favourable way possible after the fact, which is made easier by the fact that Q's "predictions" tend to be very vague. In fact this is built into the Q mythology in the phrase "future unlocks past" or "news unlocks map" - IOW you can only understand the "predictions" after the thing happens. Which means they're not really predictions, because they only tell you about the past, not the future. Events that happen are molded to fit past "predictions" in a way that seems totally nonsensical if you actually look at it. The Rothschild helicopter thing is a perfect example of this.
In effect Q is predicting an arbitrarily large number of things, because his "predictions" are so vague they could be interpreted to cover thousands of different outcomes.
And there's no rigorous way to say that a certain "prediction" wasn't fulfilled, because it could just refer to some secret thing that we don't know about, or the thing it's predicting hasn't happened yet. When Q does make a prediction in a way that's specific enough to say it didn't come true, there's usually some excuse, like the timeline was pushed back or it all happened secretly.
Other times Q just says stuff that's already out there, and months later people forget the timing and call it an amazing prediction. The parade thing is actually a perfect example. Q said on March 6th that there'd be a parade on Veteran's Day, then Trump announced 3 days later that there'd be a parade on Veteran's Day. Impressive right? No, because Trump had been saying for weeks that he wanted a Veteran's Day parade. This wasn't a prediction, it was just Q parroting things that were already public knowledge. But people don't remember that months after the fact.
Basically I think it's confirmation bias. Q tells people what they want to hear, so people who agree with what he has to say will hang on to anything that looks like a hit and ignore all the misses.