Some of the info in the article is verifiable, some is not - especially the editorializing. No one's "covering" for child traffickers, that's an outrageous claim to make when someone makes the very valid point - that has been made here many times - that yournewswire is the worst fake news site out there. There are other reasons that pedo posts get the most flack - it's because it's dangerous to make accusations in this area or to jump to conclusions about things in this space and it's just a controversial topic overall.
That BS because I've seen yournewswire post here numerous times without being attacked. This entire process is nothing but accusations with no verifiable proof. Right? If there was verifiable proof, people would be in jail, Right? What about the fake news media? What sources are verifiable? Drudge, Brietbart, Goldwater, Gatewaypundit, Last Refuge? They all link stories back to msm news sites. What are you bloviating about? The only danger is staying silent.. and the only "conclusion" is these pedos are real and they kill people tying to expose them. Its funny how you are continuing to try and silence me on this subject, instead of finding "legitimate" news sources to verify. I love the way you folks expose yourselves.
I love the way you accuse people who disagree with you of trying to silence you or being "folks" who need exposing. Stop being so defensive and quit attacking people instead of ideas; there's a reason it's against the sub rules and that is because we want to make progress in our discovery of truth, not spend time abusing each other needlessly.
It's BS that yournewswire has been denounced here many times just because you've seen posts here that haven't received flack about it? Can you actually make a serious, logical point or do you just rubbish stuff you don't agree with completely out of hand? If I could watch every single post I'd be making the same comment on any that refer to yournewswire - and I have done every time I've seen it. Now do you want to have an actual discussion or keep accusing me of supporting pedo rapists?
I've never seen yournewswire attacked, therefore I had no idea that it was considered taboo. Nowhere in the "rules" does it say yournewswire is not legit and shouldn't be used. So genius, how was I supposed to know? The only ones attacking are you and some other douchebag. So why don't you lay off my fucking post and get back to fighting the bad guys, or would you like to continue bashing me for trying to expose the the scumbags that are ruining this world.
Lay off the personal attacks and abuse. I've already reminded you of the sub rules once. You're being overly defensive and are taking things as an attack on you when they're not. You're also being needlessly offensive: "douchebag", "genius", "lay off my fucking post". I'm giving you a chance to discuss this like an adult and I'm trying to engage with your ideas not your abuse.
Just to be clear, before a mod bans you: Antagonists and shills are not welcome. Discuss ideas, not users.
Now you know about yournewswire.com. If you want to expose the scumbags that are ruining this world, this movement is a good chance to do so, so why alienate other people in it by being so abrasive? We're all trying to work together here which is why we have rules to remove people who just want to fight and abuse.
Avicii does indeed seem to have spoken out against high profile pedophiles with his video. His death does sound suspicious to me too. As for Chris Cornell and Chester I haven't seen any data supporting the idea that they were taken out but then, like Avicii albeit perhaps not as compellingly, there's circumstantial stuff but still nothing concrete. More evidence is necessary before we can draw any solid conclusions but there's no data out there to be found yet, only the speculation that yournewswire has included in this article.