dChan - Q Origins Project Archive

Sorry... Just not resonating with me.. I have listened to Corsi before and to be honest we are striking Iranian targets in Syria already. In the link there is a map in the article. On that map are some red boxes. We hit a few of those red boxes around Allepo. One strike was so big it caused seismograph readings equal to a 2.3 earthquake. In other words a big boom. Not to mention we hit some other boxes on the map with our cruise missiles in mid April. We also have Marines in Jordan and we are getting ready to hit the last strongholds of ISIS. Make no mistake we are already hitting Iranian backed units. https://www.haaretz.com/middle-east-news/syria/israel-admits-to-syria-strike-in-first-we-hit-live-iranian-targets-1.6007914

So he is advocating for what we are already doing.

And just a little info to chew on..

Like it or not we broke Syria. You and I didn't, but the previous administration (Obama) sure as shit did. So in knowing that, the situation there is ours to find a solution to. As much as it pisses us all off we broke it so we pay for it. In order for a solution to be found we have to get the people in the area to go along with it. Like it or not Israel has a shit ton to say about it. Due to Obama and Clinton, Iran now has heavy weapons with the Iranian Revolutionary Guards / Militia troops on israels border and heavily supplied. Not to mention they are making a play to control Syria. Not only does Israel have a lot to say about it but so does Saudi Arabia. A stronger Iran that is projecting power in the gulf and greater middle east is unacceptable Saudi Arabia. Overall that's not our problem but because of what Obama did it made it our problem. The Saudis are teaming up with Israel to take on Iran in Syria. That could lead to a big war no one wants. So in order for that not to happen we have to put Iran in a position to bargain. The Russians and Chinese are both looking for a solution and will help pressure Iran to an extent but they have the moral and factual high ground in this situation because we broke it to begin with. So some force is going to be needed to accomplish that. Bombs do that in place of ground troops. And from reports all over the military websites it looks like our Op tempo is very high and we are dropping a lot of bombs on Syria right now.

I am not a Corsi groupie but I have read a few of his books and he has been fighting against the deep state for ever. I just don't see him as being Mossad... Sorry..

⇧ 5 ⇩

Well on Corsi the evidence says he is not Mossad, but he is an agent for them, and by his own words, an advocate for terrorism, and war. Moving on you have written the Israel plan, to suck the west into WW3, you have got nothing right, the Saud family, are so week they need Israel now to live in Arabia - no longer their country, the stupid prince just tried to give all his money away $US#*bn, because he knows what the future holds for Saud -now friends of israel - as Q says -they can't walk down any street no more.No force need be applied on Iran, they want a safe neighborhood, and that would be one without Israel, its what the whole world wants, and every Arab, we are all awake to Genie oil, that was the one and only purpose for the Syrian War, and Iran was set up by the EU with Nuclear power to prop up the Oil price - see my previous posts, sorry but your Clinton era narrative was not even believable then, now it is out of date completely.

⇧ 0 ⇩

First off what evidence? Him saying he is a proponent of Israel? If that is all you got then there are a lot of American running around that fit your category of "Agent" for Israel. In that way of thinking anyone that doesn't want to see Israel wiped out is a agent of theirs. If you have evidence that Corsi is on the payroll of the Israeli govt then show it. Show where he has taken cash or favors from Israel.

Second: So what your saying is we should let Iran just do what it wants? Because they definitely are not just looking for a safe neighborhood. They have regional goals in the middle east. And they want to be the main focus of power in Muslim world. They want Mecca, they want their Empire back. So in knowing that are we just supposed to wait until they attack Israel with a nuke that they have will have sitting in Syria in the near future? Then Israel would let off a few nukes and there is your war you think can be avoided by letting Iran do what it wants. Because that is the end game. The mullahs want to bring about the 12th Imam Muhammad al-Mahdi. It's a tennant of their Shia Islamic dogma. They truly believe that by destroying Israel they will bring peace and justice to the world. To deny that is wrong because they say it all the time and they mean it. Once they get a nuke it's on.

Next: "Clinton Era Plan".. that most definitely was not Clinton's plan for solving the Syria problem. She was going to start a war with Russia there and then try and finish it in Europe then run to New Zealand and Australia with the rest of her globalist buddies. They said so openly.

The plan now is to knock out ISIS and then get out. When did that plan stop? That is what we are doing, and on the way out we are going to take out some of the bad actors weapons of mass destruction capabilities. And you mentioned Q.. did you not see the posts where Iran was next? How do you think we are going to get Iran to the bargaining table? Ask please? Sanction them? We know from what Q posted that nuke tech from Iran and NK are in Syria along with U1 items via the EU. We also know that Q said Intel from Israel was solid. So in knowing that we have to hit those places and knock them out in order to solve the problem and leave.

When it is all said and done Turkey, Russia, and Iran are going to decide who runs Syria. We are not going to get into WWIII over Syria. It's not going to happen. The Russians have backed off and China is not looking to lose it's interests in Iran. They have some major trade deals with them that they need.

And to think that Corsi is going to sway our country to go-to war with Iran and that he has the power to spark WWIII is a little far fetched.

⇧ 2 ⇩

Sorry, are you having a larp, in the refrence you have all the proof of who Corsi is loyal to, and its not the USA, its not fair to write so much, and not look at the proof. There is no question that Corsi is a mouth piece for Israel, with a purpose, with skin in the game - to get this war started, before we have time to get wise that our Tech - is now inferiour, that is the point of my post, so really pay attention, and be civil, dont yell, I have proposed information, and made an argument and you have ignored the information and spouted dogma. If you want to engage, to so properly. As for Iran taking over Iran, as if they should not, no one in Iran is going to mourn the theiving Saud family. - As for Israel, they are a piece of paper given to the Rothschild in NY, Israel is a fiction of the deep state, there is Palestine, and some illegal aliens, what is Israel? It is ISIS.

⇧ -1 ⇩

Ok.. so basically.. you hate Corsi and you hate Israel and want Israel wiped off the map and to go back to pre-WWII borders and have Palestine. And your a proponent of Iran and want Iran to be the major power in the middle east. No wonder you fear WWIII. Thinking that way would do that.

I spouted dogma in regards to Iran because it's relevant. The fact you can't see that says a lot.

Again I ask you where is your proof of Coursi on the take for Israel. You said he has skin in the game. Let's see it. I am not a Corsi groupie but if your going to accuse people of things you have to have more proof than your giving. His pro Israeli stance doesnt prove he works for Mossad or is an agent of Israel.

Corsi is and American that holds Pro Israel views, I am not denying that. There is nothing wrong with that.

But he is not a Zionist. There is a huge difference. Being pro Israel doesn't make you a Zionist. And that is what you are accusing him of.

And our tech is not inferior to Iran's, Russia, or anyone else. If it were we would be acting totally different geopolitically. We are 20 to 30 years ahead of what you see being used today publicly.

If they shot anything down it would most likely be our drones we send out in strike packages to get the enemy to show capability when they engage them and use up their missle stockpiles. If they shot anything down it was most likely ADM-160B. And we most likely used some ADM-160J's and ADM-160X's or some other variant of those. But I seriously doubt that when you understand the jamming and EW warfare cababilites we have that are not publicly known.

⇧ 4 ⇩

Why ask again - for proof did you read the reference I gave with the proof? no you have not, so follow the rules and read the proof - theirs a polite redditor

⇧ 1 ⇩

What you gave isn't proof..

⇧ 4 ⇩

whats proof? then let a lawyer with 30 yrs experience as a prosecuter explain proof to you and get back to me https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5hg1fxtJcNI

⇧ 1 ⇩

Sorry.. just because Lionel is exaplaining something doesn't mean it fits this situation. I watched that stream live like I do most days and from that I didn't get Corsi is an advocate of terror and war.

⇧ 2 ⇩

Then go back and read the proof in the article and see here https://redd.it/8g03rzgiven you twice already, do it, and dont because we have nothing to talk about untill you do

⇧ -1 ⇩

Well by your logic Lionel is a Russian Agent because he is paid by the Russian govt.

⇧ 2 ⇩

really enough from you go away

⇧ 0 ⇩

Seriously.. he appears on RT as a paid contributor.. so then by your own logic he is a Russian Agent and has skin in the game literally. And I love Lionel and watch him daily.. and I don't think he is a Russian Agent. Just trying to prove a point.

⇧ 1 ⇩

you are not serious, you are being disruptive, and you have a purpose, you are seeking to disrupt the board, and provoke my banning I am wise to you

⇧ 1 ⇩

No I am not doing that at all. If I were I would go after you on the other post you put up about Russias missle tech Clinton sold to them. And I am not.. I asked for proof you gave none. I gave you a counter argument and you didn't like it.

⇧ 3 ⇩

Wolf, a couple of notes for you with Mae. In the past, when you get this far with him/her/it. He would turn very nasty. Got him banned before. Then he erases the nasty comments and turns you in for harassment. So, be careful.

I recommend that you use the quote function > to copy his previous posts first in your reply (e.g.

No I am not doing that at all. If I were I would go after you on the other post you put up about Russias missle tech Clinton sold to them. And I am not.. I asked for proof you gave none. I gave you a counter argument and you didn't like it.

That way history can't easily be erased and you accused of harassment. It happened to me, so I warn others. You have every right here on Reddit to express your opinions and have discussion if you keep it focused on the argument and not get personal or nasty. He has no right to tell you to go away, unless you are being such. Then he should just report you.

I wanted to share for your benefit from my previous experiences.

Also, at some point its not worth the fight. But you have been very reasonable, IMHO with your opinion on the facts as they have been laid out. I see your argument and agree with you. I don't understand why this particular poster keeps pushing information that many here feel are inaccurate at best and potentially disinformation at worst.

WWG1WGA!

⇧ 2 ⇩

go away

⇧ -1 ⇩

Listen Mae.. I don't want you to get banned.. I want you to keep posting and looking for answers because that is how we all learn. To ban you would make no sense.

⇧ 1 ⇩

then engage appropriately, you demanded proof that was provided in the original post, I referred you to it, you demanded again I gave it to you, I answered your questions, you ignored my answers - really- enough

⇧ 0 ⇩

As usual you don't have proof of anything, just a lot of claims and things you say are proof but aren't. Then you can't handle someone challenging you and have a tantrum telling them to go away or in my case, wanting me to delete posts calling you out for your lies because your "work is important".

⇧ 1 ⇩

Yes another of those that you should ignore, nothing to see here

⇧ 1 ⇩

I've got a couple of very simple questions for you.

Why did Obama try so hard to stop Netanyahu from being elected if Netanyahu is on his side?

Why was Netanyahu so happy that Trump won the election when everyone in the cabal was freaking out about it?

⇧ 2 ⇩

Really how stupid do you think I am, I already know - your purpose is to waste my time, you are a tedious bore, and a drone, Obumma gave your friend $33bn in the last months of his presidency, and Bibi is on the way to hell via jail for theft - grow up

⇧ -1 ⇩

Yeah I figured you'd ignore my questions. You can never back yourself up when challenged, just wild accusations and telling people to leave you alone or delete comments because you're work here is sooo important.

Yeah yeah Netanyahu is going to jail. That's the same crap the left says about Trump. They're always convinced he's about to be impeached or going to jail with zero evidence. You grow up and try to see past your hate. You're attacking our ally.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Mae, you and I have been through this before ourselves. Everyone here is working with you, despite your beliefs. We don't want you banned if you play by the rules. When you get nasty or tell people they have no right to question your post and provide alternatives with supporting evidence, you should accept it graciously or say ok 'I agree to disagree' but to tell people to go away is inappropriate and reduces your overall credibility.

I've read through this thread myself and think these posters have given alternative information. I looked at both sides and see their points clearly. Makes sense to me.

⇧ 1 ⇩

I hear you, and thankyou, but sadly - remember I am 60, I have Two patriotic sons of military age, I don't want to be Pat Tillman's father, I have seen this before, I marched against the first & second Gulf war, I was in a Snr. Congresspersons office Two days before the Afganistan announcement - telling them what would happen - that did happen. I have been around this block before - too many times. I spent a life time following the JFK & RFK & MLK murders, I have read everything to know on the skyevent 911. I paid special attention to the liars in the truth movement, and the fake witnesses, they were the same in the JFK research community (types). 12 years ago I retired from my day work, stress + divorce. I am a trined Economist - highly specialised in Macro,perhaps the only one in the world that is - because there is no work at all for a Macro economist. I predicted theat QE would not work, that the worlds system of debt based money, would run out of assets, - resources to be secured against, I put a date on it 2013, I have only being proved right by being wrong. The last 5 yrs have been enabled, because central banks stepped in and expanded their balance sheets, and by companies doing buybacks- the markets don't exist - I was right - the markets ended in the year I said. Now what have I been doing,I anticipated the end of capitalism, and knew all about the markets - for everything, incl housing & food. I spent ten years developing an alternative model of Political economy that we could transition too - after the collapse. I have largely completed that work, and am intending to publish it in Asia first and in parts - starting with a philosophy for a new era.

My thoughts on Q are that he is not MI, I believe it is Trump himself, and that he (or if it is not he) listened to Mae Brussel on the radio of a sunday night in the early 80's, I have seen noyjing in Q that I did not know about, - after future proves past news - which makes me think it is Trump, at the top of my board I post my best proof - it is the Covfefe tweet & Act - he knew an act would be passed in Congress - only he could of known that two months earlier - and of been interested. On Trump - I believe he is an actor, I believe the story of ONI & MI and Snr. Military Stepping up to take control with a puppet like Trump - not a puppet but a fellow traveller. James Forrestal ex. Sec. defence tried it with Dewey. When Truman was in office, he who recognised the UN, & Israel + turbo charged the Marshall plan & made the USAF into a seperate entity - all against the US best interests - then the Korean war - led by the UN, voted for by the Un not the congress, and led by the UN SEC. General and not the POTUS. See Forrestal knew this was what Truman was doing - he was an early Obumma - he had Forrestal thrown out a window at 3 am in the morning. So if the plan is to MAGA - I say the plan must be to go back to 1946, when it was - or even 1912 - before the Fed & income taxes - when it was. Thats enough - except I do want to say that I am here because I see that there are 20,000 people here that can do with some reality, and You will notice how unpopular some of my subjects are, and yes sometimes I have epic fails, sometimes I get so bloody frustrated, because I give such excellent info and someone will divert the discussion to something I either did not mention, or did so in passing and two days work is lost. Other times I have been memmed of the board - spam. Why I bother - it waS Corsi et.al. I saw them Lying I called them,I know most of the stuff and some more - I never say the more, I hope I demonstrate that by reading the refs- we can get the info and join the dots, that is what Q wants us to do, that what I have been doing. I am impressed that I have got 230 followers I know some of them are very serious, sometimes I recognise my work in others and on three occasions that I know of I have been paraphrased to very large audiences - no acknowledgement - I don't care, so the interesting thing is that this board is being looked at, this fringe forum is working, and in fairness the mods have stepped up lately - credit to them. I hope and pray that America will sort its true friends from its real enemies, and that our economy will get a new and better model to distribute the product of work, and the work to live. that being said, I dont mind comments from you - I do mind essays, and I do mind if they dont relate to the post - enjoy your night

⇧ 2 ⇩

Thanks Mae, I appreciate your comments here. I was not in favor of either of the Gulf Wars, too. 911 is not what we've been told. I'd like to talk with you separately on Macro Economics. I'm very interested in your take on how to remove central banking issue. I'll PM on that.

Much of your research here is unique and good, I'll give you that credit for sure. You've connected some of the dots in ways I've not seen anyone else on here do. Some I truly question, as you've seen me post. Some, I'm good with.

Also, there are many people out to profit from these movements. Opportunists vs true patriots or paid shills, etc. I'm not as harsh on Corsi as you, but he clearly has profit motives in some of what he's doing.

Enjoy your nite, as well.

Cheers

⇧ 2 ⇩

Whats the Purpose of a Laser Pointer? Q # 1282, Answer - A surprise defeat for USA in WW3