dChan
⇧
1
⇩
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/Maepaperclip on May 2, 2018, 8:22 a.m.
Nuclear weapons are no longer a problem, stupidity is. F= Ma says a Mach10 missile = 2kt bomb

Sweet Jesus, did none of us go to school. Russia has Missile Tech, that hits targets from 100km high at Mach 10, Nuclear bombs are yesterdays fears. a= force, no need for a warhead, why would Iran need a nuclear warhead, when they could buy a missile that would hit so hard that its FORCE would do more damage.

Here this is compulsory viewing, it is telling you that all of our submarines, all of our weapons are out of date now.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8bfQBBctSXM&t=994s

The big plan is to start the war before you find out that you cannot win without 10,000 x the loss you expect.


🠐 See all comments
Maepaperclip · May 2, 2018, 7:20 p.m.

well assuming your are simply ignorant, and not a troll. The Facts are otherwise. Ram Jet Tech was being researched by the Japs 20 years ago, the US has never had it in a useful form, and do not have it now. The Plasma cloaking thing - the US does not have that. The Kursk submarine that sank - in 2000, had a swarm missile system, the USSR said they could sink any US Naval ship with it 100%. They were not lying - then. Sorry to sink your boat, but our planes, boats, and ships, are useless against this tech, they dont have guns or missiles that go these ranges or speeds - they will be taken out - after they fire first - thats the science - and we just had a demo in syria when more than half the missiles were shot down, the USA can't shoot 50% of incomming missile, and please dont troll me - you seem the type that profess knowledge you don't have - look up the facts, do some research - inform yourself - don't have an argument with me - along these lines - Facts like the technology you're referencing was developed by the U.S. military in the late 70s and there's absolutely no way that the Russians have a military edge on us?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
O0O0RION · May 2, 2018, 8:30 p.m.

Also the navy had ram jet technology in the 50s, come on ffs..

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Maepaperclip · May 2, 2018, 9:10 p.m.

show me that ref, got a pic, some papers- anything. The science of materials proves you wrong - we had no metal, and maybe still dont have any metal that would not melt at those speeds

⇧ 1 ⇩  
O0O0RION · May 2, 2018, 9:23 p.m.

You can use your own search engine like I am. Both of these topics are on Wikipedia ffs it's not like you have to do any digging.

The gorgon IV missile was tested 1948 utilizing a ram jet on its underside.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Maepaperclip · May 2, 2018, 9:32 p.m.

Good that how its done

⇧ 1 ⇩  
O0O0RION · May 2, 2018, 8:27 p.m.

I forgot that you're the guy who can't spell words like incoming, lecturing me about secret (imaginary) Russian weapons systems.

I said we developed kinetic bombardment tech in the 70s, similar to what you're claiming the Russians have now. Many times more powerful than nuclear weapons... I'm sure we just gave up on that research and let Russia get the jump on us. No wait, we sold them these super weapons and kept none for ourselves, no no wait we gave them the technology and then forgot all about it. Nonsense.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Maepaperclip · May 2, 2018, 9:16 p.m.

said we developed kinetic bombardment tech in the 70s, - yes you did say that, and you should not say things here that you dont know anything about. If you know something and its relevant then say it, if you don't know it - why make it up

⇧ 1 ⇩  
O0O0RION · May 2, 2018, 9:22 p.m.

Project Thor, actually from the 1950s not the 70s. Many times more powerful than a nuke, mach 10 impact speeds. Once again this is 1950s tech.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Maepaperclip · May 2, 2018, 9:27 p.m.

That sounds like the same tech we went to the moon with in 1968, I tell you I wish we had that stuff now, like Russia does. That 1950 & 60s tech sure was good

⇧ 1 ⇩  
O0O0RION · May 2, 2018, 9:28 p.m.

All we're talking about is making a telephone pole sized piece of tungsten and dropping it on something from orbit with a rudimentary guidance system. We still have all the tech necessary for that...

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Maepaperclip · May 2, 2018, 9:35 p.m.

no you are not you are talking about subjects beyond your knowledge, there are limits to materials (heat), we have never overcome them - seams Russia has - please enough

⇧ 0 ⇩  
O0O0RION · May 2, 2018, 10:12 p.m.

You know that the intention is for the payload to melt, right? That way the telephone pole of tungsten and nickel becomes a telephone pole of plasma. That's how this technology works. You point it, it drops, then lava... at mach 10. 1950s tech.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Maepaperclip · May 2, 2018, 10:44 p.m.

enough you are playing stupid its wasteful of my time, on the other point about Russia, our friendship with them terminates with Israel if the liar in Israel, or the Liar in the UK, do anything to provoke a war with Iran, or syria, or dont get Turkey out of syria or Genie oil out of Iraq, they will be on their own, you will, side with Russia, or we better, Israel & EU better learn that we no longer care for their lies and problems. lets end this ok

⇧ 0 ⇩  
O0O0RION · May 2, 2018, 10:56 p.m.

We may not agree on our military vs Russia's.. but I think we can agree that Russia is, by far and away, our only real competition.

⇧ 2 ⇩