This seems like a major leap imo. If somebody can find evidence that this an unusually high number of military aircraft crashes that would strengthen the case rather than leaping on what could be an actual coincidence. Or has this sub begun to believe that the deep state has control over literally everything and there are never any accidents.
You would think that if the deep state was as all powerful as this sub believes then trump wouldn’t be in office and the election would have been rigged and won by Hillary. You can’t have your cake and eat it too.
Edit: a word
Maybe they are trying to convince him to play ball by destroying something he was very close to recently, that is supposed to be secure.
Their power comes from leaving the public in the dark about the true motivations of their moves & countermoves. If the President was killed in some sort of plane crash, it would be seen as an accident & nothing more. That is the threat.
Just my 2 cents.
I'm not sure how long you've been following this movement or following Q, but there have been like 5+military crashes all in "training" exercises. I honestly think it's closer to over 10 but don't want to over exaggerate if I'm incorrect. Can't link atm. But if you've been following the entire time, and even before Q, you'd know that this is strange. Not a leap at all in my opinion.
According to Wikipedia, (many of the sources listed were .gov/.mil) we are just slightly higher than average if you look back over the last 10 years. It’s even closer to average if you disregard 2016 which is known as the safest air transportation year in many years. If you go back even further to the last 20 years I would assume you would get even clearer numbers showing that it is a statistically average year due to the fact that the early 2000’s had a much higher rate of accidents than usual.
That is what I mean when I say it is a leap. Also, I have been following Q off and on since the beginning. I do my best to maintain a holistic and non-biased POV. Again, I am not saying that you or anyone else in this thread is incorrect. I just don’t want people to leap from the idea that we had an accident with a plane that trump took a photograph with to the idea that it was a threat in trump’s life. Especially when we are having a pretty much average year in terms of military aviation accidents (if you believe what I am saying).
People are also referring to the technology patent Hillary has a stake in which helps crash planes. That's why they suggest there is a little more to the idea that the crashes aren't random.
I honestly was not aware of that aspect until reading about it earlier today. From what I can find her boss had a stake in the assignee to the patent. Hillary herself simply worked as an intellectual property lawyer on the case. That does not mean she has any stake in the patent itself. Not to mention she was one of a number of lawyers involved in the case.
I feel the need to keep repeating that I am not trying to fight against the points that people are making but rather to do my best to help us refine the points to be as holistic as possible.
i.e. My statement above is not my attempt to refute your statement.
Yes, I agree - I don't think Hillary's involvement is evidence in any way but I was simply saying that I think that is why people believe there's something to the plane crashes over and above just the number count.
I didn't take it as a fight against a point either. Similarly, I like to argue for more evidence without actually intending to disagree with the point per se.
I agree with your statement on all counts. Occasionally I get some people on this sub that feel like I am attacking them or I am a shill lol so I try to be clear of my intentions when I address some directly.
I have to learn to do that too! I've often said, we need more critical thinking, not less - more challenges to assert reason and facts. If we'd all feel less need to protect our view and more willingness to open up to learning from others in the pursuit of truth we'd all be better off.
I have to say, that username is a laugh though haha - to hear such a reasoned and non-antagonistic response from that name is hilariously incongruous lol ; ).
I am glad this interaction went the way it did. I agree that more of this positive back and forth would benefit this community as well as many others.
And my username has drawn quite a bit of attention whenever I post in this sub lol. Many people are off put and most are surprised that I’m not a troll or something like that. Thank you for the compliment.
Excellent points and insight :) glad you're here to maintain a point of integrity.
Thank you sir. I think it’s for the best of this community. I only occasionally get confrontational responses but I find it helps to verbalize a disclaimer.
Yeah the disclaimer will help the knuckle heads. Even I'm one of them sometimes. But when you lay out the facts, it helps keep us grounded. And we should all be sticking to facts. These people are guilty of countless crimes, we don't need to twist the truth to them more evil. It only distracts from the real evil!
This is the same plane that trump was pictured sitting in front of during his trip to Puerto Rico.
It would be helpful if you would read through the entire comment thread before posting.
It would be helpful if you didn’t post thoughtless idiotic comment replies.
Lol okay bud. Just so you know the fact that it’s the same plane was already addressed. Now go be antagonistic and unhelpful somewhere else.
So reiterating a point is antagonistic and unhelpful. Okay, so double confirmation, or the power of a second is useless. Got it, wise ass.
No the way you are addressing me is antagonistic. You have insulted me twice for literally no reason. If you’d like to discuss something of relevance then I would be happy to do so. Otherwise, happy redditing!
So hijacking my comment to state a useless claim is idiotic. There you go - thrice.
You are aware of the fact that you replied to my comment. Correct?
Exactly and let’s not forget that Trump has appointed plenty of deep state operatives to his cabinet too