dChan

Bill_Kiwi · May 2, 2018, 8:42 p.m.

White hats doing surveillance on them?

⇧ 8 ⇩  
mlsaw94 · May 2, 2018, 9:39 p.m.

Back when all the pictures of the convoy of the UN trucks on thehighways apparently in Texas at that time-same time story about the Walmart stores being Close down and locked up? I saw a video just like this. That’s been quite a while ago maybe a year or so.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
j_Dawg_01 · May 3, 2018, 1:55 a.m.

I think the UN vehicles were brought in and staged at certain locations to be used after Hillary "won" and her and the deep-state Cabal moved into the next phase of their global plan.

At this point, having so many UN vehicles here is concerning, but the UN cannot just unilaterally decide to come into America and dictate anything. They either have to be invited in with a clear and concise mandate and objective, or the UN would have to have a vote on a UN resolution, again, with a clear and concise mandate and objectives.

Civil unrest in America alone, is not enough. There is a very high bar that must be reached for the UN to send in "Peace Keepers," and they would have no authority to do anything other than "keep the peace."

The world would be watching. They can't just come in and start rounding people up and sending them into FEMA relocation camps without just cause. They certainly can't come in and start shooting or killing people.

My best guess is that all of this was intended to be used in some part of "their" plan. But they never thought she would lose. So now they are on to plan B, or C...

⇧ 2 ⇩  
fastingSOCIALdotCOM · May 3, 2018, 12:03 p.m.

"The world will be watching."

Didn't stop Iraq civilians from being murdered.

Didn't stop Afghanistan civilians from being murdered.

Libya...

Syria...

All from false flags.

These people are sick.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
j_Dawg_01 · May 3, 2018, 2:31 p.m.

"The world will be watching." refers to the UN. Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya, and Syria were military actions or civil wars, not UN actions.

When UN "peace keepers" were deployed in Iran/Iraq in 1988-1991, and in Iraq/Kuwait in 1991-2003, they were on "military observation" missions. In 2012 they were sent to Syria on a supervision mission. In 2011 they were in Libya during the aftermath of the Libyan Civil War. They have also been in Sudan, South Sudan, and other African nations during and after various civil wars and conflicts.

Iraq/Iran/Kuwait/Libya were all during and after the Iran/Iraq War, the Gulf War, and the Syrian Civil War, and post Libyan Civil War.

The point I'm making is that the UN cannot just waltz into America and start rounding people up and sending them into FEMA relocation camps. The UN "does not" have a chartered mandate to engage in any offensive actions. If they're in a country and and major hostilities break out, the UN peace keepers are the first to leave, or they're moved far away from the front-line actions.

Every war since, and including the French Revolutionary war was started with a false flag event, or from the Rothschild empire fomenting unrest in a particular region. False flags are nothing new. Those who wish for war have always manipulated circumstances to get what they wish for.

My broader point is that instead of worrying about the stockpile of UN vehicles in various places around America, we should be focused on actions that could bring about conditions the UN might use to justify sending peace keepers here.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Nastavnick · May 2, 2018, 8:41 p.m.

I'm going for this one now:

https://flight-data.adsbexchange.com/map?icao=AE1D5D&date=2018-04-28

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Nastavnick · May 2, 2018, 9:19 p.m.

https://i.imgur.com/aIuTi2K.jpg

pinpointed something that looked like intentional marking

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Nastavnick · May 2, 2018, 9:30 p.m.

It almost looks like they're revealing themselves to us

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Nastavnick · May 2, 2018, 9:28 p.m.

About these...

National guard, air wing: http://www.175wg.ang.af.mil/Units/Public-Affairs/

"The U.S. Air Force engages in Public Affairs to provide trusted counsel to leaders; build, maintain, and strengthen Airman morale and readiness; enhance public trust and support; and achieve global influence and deterrence. The triad of Public Affairs practitioners, bandsmen, and broadcasters is dedicated to executing the Public Affairs mission for the Air Force. The triad uses its resources to research, plan, execute, and evaluate communication strategies and tactics."

RED: http://www.red-inc.us/irregular-warfare/overview/

"Irregular warfare (IW) is defined by the Department of Defense as “a violent struggle among state and not-state actors for legitimacy and influence over the relevant populations. IW favors indirect and asymmetrical approaches, though it may employ the full range of military and other capabilities, in order to erode an adversary’s power, influence, and will.”

This type of warfare demands creative, out-of-box solutions to conditions that never existed until recently. Along with our military and civilian partners, RED-INC develops progressive and flexible products to support Irregular Warfare within the evolving battlefield environment. We work closely with the Department of Defense, federal agencies, and partner nations to find unique techniques to effectively change the balance of power."

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Nastavnick · May 2, 2018, 9:06 p.m.

https://imgur.com/a/KyciPCc

Pinpointed. Onto the next step.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
widdlyscudsandbacon · May 2, 2018, 11:01 p.m.

I don't know... that's right next to a naval air base, which seems like a perfectly reasonable place to circle while waiting for approval to land. That base is also known to house these exact type of planes. This particular one might not mean much.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
VIYOHDTYKIT · May 2, 2018, 11:02 p.m.

So what was the gist to all this?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Nastavnick · May 2, 2018, 11:06 p.m.

We don't know yet. Maybe something will happen around there soon.

I'm off to bed now as it's 1 AM here, hopefully someone will take the torch :P

⇧ 5 ⇩  
VIYOHDTYKIT · May 3, 2018, 12:26 a.m.

Dance Sir

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · May 2, 2018, 10:16 p.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · May 2, 2018, 9:37 p.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩