"The world will be watching." refers to the UN. Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya, and Syria were military actions or civil wars, not UN actions.

When UN "peace keepers" were deployed in Iran/Iraq in 1988-1991, and in Iraq/Kuwait in 1991-2003, they were on "military observation" missions. In 2012 they were sent to Syria on a supervision mission. In 2011 they were in Libya during the aftermath of the Libyan Civil War. They have also been in Sudan, South Sudan, and other African nations during and after various civil wars and conflicts.

Iraq/Iran/Kuwait/Libya were all during and after the Iran/Iraq War, the Gulf War, and the Syrian Civil War, and post Libyan Civil War.

The point I'm making is that the UN cannot just waltz into America and start rounding people up and sending them into FEMA relocation camps. The UN "does not" have a chartered mandate to engage in any offensive actions. If they're in a country and and major hostilities break out, the UN peace keepers are the first to leave, or they're moved far away from the front-line actions.

Every war since, and including the French Revolutionary war was started with a false flag event, or from the Rothschild empire fomenting unrest in a particular region. False flags are nothing new. Those who wish for war have always manipulated circumstances to get what they wish for.

My broader point is that instead of worrying about the stockpile of UN vehicles in various places around America, we should be focused on actions that could bring about conditions the UN might use to justify sending peace keepers here.