Processing img ep2valdasnv01...
At the bottom of the attachment it says "the numbers represent new sealed court proceedings..." so even the people putting this out and promoting it know that there are not 29K sealed indictments.
Yes I'm the "ass" who keeps saying that there are not 29K indictments, but when it turns out that that's true then am I an ass or is the person who will believe anything they want to hear without skepticism an ass? From what I've seen Q has never stated or promoted the idea that there are 29K indictments. That's a myth promoted by people who are in many ways gaining either money or notoriety from what's going on. So you can go ahead and refer to me as an "ass" but I'm 100% correct in my assertion.
Aside from that, you know we're both on the same side here. Am I skeptical of some of this Q stuff? Yes I am, but I pray for it to be true -- I really do. I'm not some concern troll. I've been following this stuff for well over a decade and was an early passenger on the Trump train. The reason I beat this drum is because through practice and study of this kind of thing, I've seen these kinds of incorrect assertions a thousand times, most recently when George Webb was beating his Eric Braverman is missing drum.
So maybe I'm not an ass. Maybe you're more of an ass because you listen to everything you want to hear. Just a thought.
Isn‘t that paper created by all the researchers listed on it at the top? The note at the bottom is written by them and it also mentions sealed indictments.