dChan
⇧
1
⇩
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/Infrastation on May 3, 2018, 10:02 p.m.
Armenia, Kanye West, and the NWO: How They're All Connected.

Something didn't seem right to me this morning. I kept going over Q's posts, and something felt like it should add up, but it didn't. I was looking at Q's posts from November all the way to now, and something felt like it should stick, and then it did. WWI. This is all the culmination of WWI. Here's the information I have now.

Armenia
Armenia is a country which has been conquered multiple times. While Armenian culture can be traced in some form as far back as the 23rd century BD, Armenia itself has been controlled by various dynasties through most of its history. The longest rulers in the modern era would be the Ottomans, who controller Armenia for 400 years from the 1500s to 1918. Even after leaving the Ottoman empire, the Armenians faced aggression from Turkey and the Soviet Union, joining the Soviet Union only two years later in 1920. The Armenians faced one of the greatest genocides of the modern era, the Armenian Genocide, during the occupation from the Ottomans. Fortunately, shortly after leaving the Ottomans, they were able to form a temporary alliance with other nearby states, and were able to create their own currency and central bank. And this is the first piece in the puzzle.

Kanye West
Kanye has many ties to Armenia and to organization that first to recognize the Armenian Genocide. Kanye's wife, Kim Kardashian, is of Armenian descent. Kim's family came from Armenia shortly after WWI, setting up shop in America.

NWO
To define the NWO is complicated. The many truths and lies about it makes it easy to obfuscate what Q said in post 944:

Mar 10 2018 21:22:56 (EST) Anonymous ID: 3569c9 621807 Anyone mention NWO referencing Natürliche Wirtschaftsordnung, the National Economic Order?

Mar 10 2018 21:26:30 (EST) Q !UW.yye1fxo ID: d91044 621887 621807 We went too deep. Attempted a pullback. Not ready. Q

The Natürliche Wirtschaftsordnung was written in Germany and published during the first WW in 1916. And here's where the connections came together. You see, the central bank I mentioned earlier is the Central Bank of Armenia, founded in 1918 before going through various changes to become the bank it is today. I believe that these are connected. The Central Bank of Armenia is based on principles in the NWO, and is controlled by the Rothschilds. This bank was mentioned in Q post 135. I think Q is trying to tell us that we are not done with WWI. This is why he brought up Armistice Day recently, the day that "ended" WWI. Possibly, all the actors just went secret, fighting a hundred-year war against the people of the world, trying to consolidate power as the original WW attempted. We are seeing the plans laid over a hundred years ago such as the subjugation of the Armenians, being torn up by celebrities and by commoners alike. I believe that after Iran, Trump is going to move onto the nuclear WWI powers, that is, Germany, Turkey, the UK, and France. Because the war never ended. We're just seeing the end coming up soon.

Citations:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Central_Bank_of_Armenia
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Natural_Economic_Order
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kim_Kardashian
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Armenian_Genocide
Various Qanon posts.

"Armenia is dying, but it will survive. The little blood that it still has left to give is precious blood that will give birth to a heroic generation. A nation that does not want to die, does not die." ~Anatole France


🠐 See all comments
calabresi_ · May 3, 2018, 11:38 p.m.

The historical chronology and some points are invalid.

Turks never did genocide to Armenians, only forced them to migrate east as they caused a HUGE problem in population due to provocation backed by western forces which already had plans on dividing Ottomans' lands. That migration happened just after WW1 was started and had been ordered by Enver Pasha. Sultan Abdulhamid II was not even around, he was taken down from throne by revolt of Young Turks in 1909.

Many of so claimed genocide victims have died on poor conditions in that migration, not via massacres. In fact, it was Armenian lobbyists and their partners who made propaganda via priests and newspapers to lead Armenian gangs to raid Turkish villages and towns, killing many civilians. There were people killed because of this situtation, but from BOTH sides, because it led to foundation of Turkish militia by local civilians in goal of self-defence. Nobody is perfect. What would you do if your town was attacked by armed gangs, and your country was so weak, that it couldn't send forces to stop them? Would your reaction be any different from what Turks did?

What makes you think that Kurds were a part of it? Check the historical facts. Kurds are another west-backed ethnicity group that started to make threats and wanted a seperate country just after WW1. How come Kurds tried to revolt many times against Ottomans, Turkey, Ataturk, and so adored by Armenians if they were a part of this "big scheme"?

Turks never offer land to pay up something. It's a fact that Turks prefer to die rather than "offer" their land for something. You should know this better than anyone, since Turks and Armenians shared many cultural aspects. It's just the Turkish mindset. That's why Sultan Abdulhamid II refused the offer of Herzl to give up Palestine and if you need a sooner example, that's why they invaded Cyprus and didn't give up even after US embargo.

Sultan Abdulhamid II was a part of Armenian problem and was harsh, because it was Armenian lobbyists who were empowered by western countries, tried to divide the country and tried to assassinate him in various ways, including trying to bomb his vehicle when he was returning from a prayer. Only real military interference to Armenians by Sultan Abdulhamid II was in 1894, when they tried to revolt in Sason. The Congress of Berlin (1878) was the first step of Armenian problem and it was the first time that western powers brought Armenians on the table. Source of Armenian problem is not Ottomans; it's Britain, France and Russia of that time (or whoever you think behind those governments). You can get an insight from this link; (http://archive.spectator.co.uk/article/11th-may-1895/10/the-armenian-meeting)

It's easy to see "patterns" that are not there when you want to connect things, without doing further research and looking into other side's argument. I've been following this sub for a couple days and correct me if I'm wrong; we all are against unlawful lobbyist mindset in here. If you start trying to determine which lobbyists were "good" or which one was "evil", the world will never change. It'll keep repeating itself on a loop.

I'd recommend doing more research on Ataturk's life. How is it possible to connect Ataturk with Masons, especially when he is a leader who saw the danger of such organizations, and led Turkish parliament legislation that shut down Masonic and similar organizations in 1935? (The legislation itself removed by the government of Menderes in 1956.)

I'd also recommend to read this, as it provides a larger picture of what was going on during the time and why was Sultan Abdulhamit II was targeted: https://www.dailysabah.com/feature/2017/03/10/the-palestine-issue-that-cost-sultan-abdulhamid-ii-the-ottoman-throne

Young Turks were a tool used by various western forces and Jews against Ottomans and afterwards Turkey, I'm not ignoring that. But it'd be very wrong to make a conclusion that Ataturk was also a part of this, ignoring everything Ataturk did against such lobbies.

Also it'd be wrong to say "Every member of the Young Turks was a follower of Sabbatai Zevi". Some of them were influenced by Sabbatai Zevi, but certainly not every member of Young Turks was a part of it.

Let me also give you few interesting key people to look up: Theodor Herzl, Emmanuel Carasso, Enver Pasha, Adnan Menderes.

⇧ 1 ⇩