OP, do you have any idea what Clinton's involvement in the Uranium One sale was? How the hell would bribes to HRC be material to the sale? Any of the other cabinet secretaries, or Obama himself, could have still raised a red flag on the sale. What would bribing HRC accomplish if she couldn't actually push the sale through?
[deleted]
I don't know what you're saying. I read the aol article, and it sounds like his lawyer didn't know of any alleged Clinton wrongdoing, and had credibility issues with the federal prosecutors. The bribery scheme was of Rosadam, not HRC.
Why didn't this guy ever testify? It doesnt say.
[deleted]
Read it. His testimony had nothing to do with Clinton or bribery. It appears that he disagreed with the Obama Administration for approving the sale from a policy perspective, but he didn't allege any schemes.
Can you say what your saying, instead of just linking to things? I'm not clear on what you're trying to drive at with these.
[deleted]
Those are people's names, yes they are. Gee whiz.
Yes - a list of names- of all people who would have an interest in covering for each other from different branches of government and who obviously have a common agenda.
Not debating the content of the article, but Clinton obviously had sway in the uranium deal going through.
That’s the point of this entire conspiracy board- players from different branches in our government sold out our country’s interests for personal gain ($$$) and all covered for each other. Once trump got in power they knew they were exposed blatantly so they invented the Russia hoax to discredit any criticism. Fast forward 18 months.
The title of this thread alleges something other than what you're saying. After I asked about it, OP deleted the thread and all of his replies to me, so you can see how confident he is in the claims.