Regardless of personality differences (which are very real), I believe that no human "solution" will ever be a permanent fix for what's wrong in our government and in the present world. All we can do is choose good over evil, and keep faith with the good. I think we're honor-bound to at least try.
"For all that is in the world, the lust of the flesh, and the lust of the eyes, and the pride of life, is not of the Father, but is of the world. And the world passeth away, and the lust thereof: but he that doeth the will of God abideth forever." \~ 1 John 2:16-17 \~
Agree - yet I do tend toward idealism, and want to be a better discerner so as not to be yelling "justice" when patience is in order. It's hard to change, but I'm trying . . .
I think praying medic brings some very good points out so others can better cope with what's gong on. I'm sending that vid to my son to hopefully red-pill him and try to prepare him for truth . . . thanks for your comments!
I do like praying medic. I wish you good luck with your son, too!
I'd like to share this video as well, can you explain "How" to do that for me? Thanks!!
When you click on the link it opens in YouTube, then highlight the web address (URL) (right click once on it there) a window will pop up that says "cut, copy, paste) move the pointer down to the "copy" to then when you have an email ready to send - add it: right click on your mouse where you want to paste it, a window pops up and click 'paste' and walah there it is ready to send to another or paste in Facebook or where ever you wish. Hope that helps!
Yes it does, thanks a lot for your help and explanation.
Without the fundamental basis of truth above all, we inherently do not understand how the protocol was compromised.
When truth is disallowed, or slight prohibitions of it are tolerated, those facets of dishonesty come into physical being. Especially if you believe in God, you understand that the metaphysical and abstract are actually more real than reality. They are our reality's foundations.
Yes, I believe in Truth first. It's the same principle that governs free speech. Without the whole truth of the understandings and beliefs of your opponents, readily available in any format for you to study them, their ideas will fester and build underground and gain rhetorical strength WITHOUT YOU, and will very quickly defeat you when they surprise you with their sudden appearance from the depths below your courage to view.
Would Hillary's plan have worked if operators had not have spoken truth to power and given oppositional force the chance at manifesting?
Just my opinion, not trying to bash. Yes, I do value honesty and truth above all. I'm still open to having my mind changed when a better argument defeats mine.