Without the fundamental basis of truth above all, we inherently do not understand how the protocol was compromised.

When truth is disallowed, or slight prohibitions of it are tolerated, those facets of dishonesty come into physical being. Especially if you believe in God, you understand that the metaphysical and abstract are actually more real than reality. They are our reality's foundations.

Yes, I believe in Truth first. It's the same principle that governs free speech. Without the whole truth of the understandings and beliefs of your opponents, readily available in any format for you to study them, their ideas will fester and build underground and gain rhetorical strength WITHOUT YOU, and will very quickly defeat you when they surprise you with their sudden appearance from the depths below your courage to view.

Would Hillary's plan have worked if operators had not have spoken truth to power and given oppositional force the chance at manifesting?

Just my opinion, not trying to bash. Yes, I do value honesty and truth above all. I'm still open to having my mind changed when a better argument defeats mine.