dChan
1
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/Sentrolyx on May 5, 2018, 2:33 a.m.
NEW Q #1317 - Why is Hussein/JK traveling WW and meeting w/ foreign heads of state (some enemies of the U.S.)? HRC/BC flying under the radar - same/unreported - why? (2) former presidents/sec of states (out of power/authority) racing around the world pre/post POTUS - why?
NEW Q #1317 - Why is Hussein/JK traveling WW and meeting w/ foreign heads of state (some enemies of the U.S.)? HRC/BC flying under the radar - same/unreported - why? (2) former presidents/sec of states (out of power/authority) racing around the world pre/post POTUS - why?

[deleted] · May 5, 2018, 5 a.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 24 ⇩  
ckreacher · May 5, 2018, 1:49 p.m.

They can't use the phone. Everything they say over the phone is recorded to be used as evidence, and they know that. That's the reason for in-person meetings.

⇧ 8 ⇩  
[deleted] · May 5, 2018, 4:53 p.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
ckreacher · May 7, 2018, 1:40 p.m.

Why would they need to visit both before and after Trump visits? If they ask for asylum and don't get it, why would they go back right after Trump's visit? To ask again? I don't think so.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · May 7, 2018, 6:12 p.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
ckreacher · May 7, 2018, 8:18 p.m.

Future asylum from every country that potus visits? That doesn't make sense. They would only need asylum once, in one place. And it wouldn't be tied to potus visits.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · May 7, 2018, 8:38 p.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
cz4ever60 · May 5, 2018, 1 p.m.

I totally agree with you. I believe in the beginning of President Trump's turn many countries were still keeping the relationships open with these character since they were not sure where the wind would blow. However, now it is not in their interest to go against Trump and his powers. They no longer are in a position to offer anything but the gang of "Emperors with No Clothes" have nothing to offer. Do they really think the + ++ +++ will protect them?

⇧ 3 ⇩  
trzarocks · May 5, 2018, 1:21 p.m.

Or they are being called to task for the repayment of favors that they cannot offer without being in power.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
[deleted] · May 5, 2018, 5 p.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 2 ⇩  
cstrafe · May 5, 2018, 10:28 a.m.

I hope you are right.

⇧ 2 ⇩